论量刑事实的证明标准  

On Standards of Proof for Facts of Penalty Measurement

作　　者：袁家德[1] YUAN Jiade(School of Public Policy and Management,Anhui Jianzhu University,Hefei 230601,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽建筑大学公管学院,合肥230601

出　　处：《长春大学学报》2020年第5期90-96,共7页Journal of Changchun University

基　　金：安徽省教育厅高校人文社会科学重点项目(SK2016A0240);安徽省社会科学界联合会项目(2019CX027)。

摘　　要：我国"排除合理怀疑"证明标准具有单一化之缺陷,现行立法并未根据证明责任的承担主体、证明对象、诉讼阶段等不同进行区别对待,进而设立多元化的证明标准;同时,"排除合理怀疑"自身亦存在内涵不清、缺乏可操作性等弊端。在应然层面,影响量刑事实证明标准的要素包括证明责任的承担主体、诉讼阶段、案件事实的形成时间、被告人及被害人利益、诉讼效率等。为更好地实现量刑公正,我国量刑事实证明标准的构建应坚持独立化、层次化、多元化原则,并明确界定"清楚和有说服力的证明""排除合理怀疑""确定无疑"的适用范围。There is a defect of being undiversified in the standard of the criminal proof with"exclusion of reasonable doubt"in China.The current legislation does not make a distinction in view of the differences of the responsibility subjects,the proof objects and the litigation phases,and further establishes diversified standards of proof.At the same time,"exclusion of reasonable doubt"itself has the disadvantages of being ambiguous in implication and poor maneuverability,etc.In the theoretical level,the factors which influence the standard of proof for the facts of penalty measurement include the responsibility subjects,the litigation phases,the formation time of the case facts,the interests of the defendants and the victims,and litigation efficiency,etc.In order to better realize the penalty measurement justness,the establishment of the standards of proof should follow the principles of being independent,stratified and diversified,and clearly define the applied scopes of"the clear and convincing proof","excluding reasonable doubt"and"being beyond any doubt".

关 键 词：影响要素 排除合理怀疑 确定无疑 清楚和有说服力的证明 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]