优质护理在妇科门诊宫颈电圈切除术治疗中的应用分析  

Analysis of the Application of High-quality Nursing in the Treatment of Cervical Electric Resection in Gynecological Clinic

作　　者：徐光明 XU Guang-ming(Department of Gynecology,Qingdao West Coast New District People's Hospital,Qingdao,Shandong Province,266400 China)

机构地区：[1]青岛西海岸新区人民医院妇科,山东青岛266400

出　　处：《系统医学》2020年第5期184-186,共3页Systems Medicine

摘　　要：目的评定优质护理服务实行在妇科门诊行宫颈电圈切除手术治疗患者中的干预效果。方法对2017年6月-2018年12月该院妇科门诊收入且实施宫颈电圈切除手术治疗的66例慢性宫颈炎患者实施项目实验分析,以抽签法开展分组研究,各组入组33例,试验组选用优质护理服务,对照组选用一般护理服务,分析手术中出血总量、手术过程总用时、手术切口愈合总用时、护理服务满意合计率,计算护理服务前、护理服务后疼痛程度评分数值及焦虑状况评分数值。结果试验组手术中出血总量、手术过程总用时、手术切口愈合总用时[(7.40±0.47)m L、(6.55±0.30)min、(2.60±0.24)d]对比对照组[(10.36±0.69)mL、(15.20±0.58)min、(5.38±0.40)d]减少(t=20.367、76.096、34.235,P=0.000、0.000、0.000<0.05);试验组护理服务前疼痛程度评分数值(6.35±0.50)分对比对照组计算数值(6.40±0.54)分差别并不高(t=0.390,P=0.697>0.05),试验组护理服务后疼痛程度评分数值(1.30±0.12)分对比对照组(4.16±0.30)分减少(t=50.847,P=0.000<0.05);试验组护理服务前焦虑状况评分数值(59.50±5.26)分对比对照组计算数值(59.61±5.30)分差别并不高(t=0.084,P=0.932>0.05),试验组护理服务后焦虑状况评分数值(31.23±3.20)分对比对照组(48.60±4.17)分减少(t=18.983,P=0.000<0.05);试验组护理服务满意合计率(96.97%)对比对照组计算数值(81.82%)增多(χ^2=3.995,P=0.045<0.05)。结论在妇科门诊行宫颈电圈切除手术治疗患者中实施优质护理服务表现出较好干预效果。Objective To evaluate the intervention effect of high-quality nursing services in patients undergoing cervical electrosurgical resection in gynecological clinics. Methods An experimental analysis was performed on 66 patients with chronic cervicitis who had received cervical gynecological surgery from the hospital’s gynecological outpatient clinic from June 2017 to December 2018, and a group study was conducted by lot drawing. 33 cases were included in each group. The test group selected high-quality nursing services, and the control group selected general nursing services. The total bleeding during the operation, the total time of the surgical procedure, the total time of the surgical incision healing, and the total satisfaction rate of the nursing service and anxiety score were calculated.Results The total amount of bleeding during the operation, the total time of the surgical procedure, and the total time of the surgical incision healing [(7.40±0.47)mL,(6.55±0.30)min,(2.60±0.24)d] compared with the control group [(10.36±0.69)mL,(15.20±0.58)min,(5.38±0.40)d] decreased(t=20.367, 76.096, 34.235, P=0.000, 0.000, 0.000 <0.05);the pain score before the nursing service in the test group(6.35±0.50)points compared with the calculated value in the control group(6.40±0.54)points The difference was not high(t=0.390, P=0.697> 0.05). The pain score score(1.30±0.12)points after the nursing service in the test group was reduced compared with the calculated value(4.16 ±0.30)points in the control group(t=50.847, P=0.000 <0.05);the anxiety score before nursing service in the test group(59.50±5.26)points was not significantly different from in the control group(59.61±5.30)points(t=0.084, P=0.932> 0.05);the anxiety status score(31.23 ±3.20)points after the nursing service in the test group was reduced compared to the calculated value(48.60±4.17)points in the control group(t=18.983, P=0.000 <0.05);the total satisfaction rate of nursing service in the test group(96.97%), the control group of(81.82%) increased(χ^2=3.9

关 键 词：优质护理 妇科 门诊 宫颈电圈切除术 

分 类 号：R473.71[医药卫生—护理学]