检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王先明[1] Wang Xianming
机构地区:[1]南开大学历史学院,300350
出 处:《史学理论研究》2020年第3期55-64,158,共11页Historiography Bimonthly
摘 要:新时期以来的史学发展以"新史学"话语来诠释自己的时代价值,其成就之一就是社会史或者新社会史的兴起。在将近40年的历史进程中,社会史在不断拓展领域和跨学科延展中保持持久昌盛的基本态势,它从整体上塑造了新时期以来的中国史学的面貌。当然,如果从更为严格的角度来评鉴的话,也不得不承认,新史学在发展中出现了一些值得反思的问题,比如社会学化、区域化取向以及刻意求新的风尚,等等。在未来新时代历史学构建的进程中,这些问题应该引起学界的关注。The development of historiography in the new era has manifested in the discourse of"New Historiography."One of its achievements is the rise of Social History or"New Social History."Over the course of the past four decades,the study of social history has been prospering as it has continuously widened the research field by embracing interdisciplinary methods.As a result,its development shaped the prospects of Chinese historiography in the new era.Admittedly,if we follow a stricter standard of evaluation,there are some problems worthy of reflection in the development of New Historiography,such as the sociologization and the localization of historical research and the pursuit of new fashions in research.So we should pay attention to these problems in academia in the new era.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7