“巴勒斯坦诉美国使馆迁移案”的国际法研究  

The International Law Study on the Case of“Relocation of the United States Embassy to Jerusalem”

作　　者：管建强[1] 王云洲 Guan Jianqiang;Wang Yunzhou

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学国际法学院

出　　处：《国际法研究》2020年第3期24-39,共16页Chinese Review of International Law

摘　　要：美国承认耶路撒冷为以色列首都,并将大使馆迁至耶路撒冷,巴勒斯坦和美国就迁馆行为的正当性展开法律上的博弈。巴勒斯坦在国际法院起诉美国,该案件在实体和程序上都存在极大争议。从国际法院诉讼主体资格的要求方面来看,巴勒斯坦在本案件中具有诉讼主体地位;从美国退约行为对本案不产生效力方面来看,国际法院对案件拥有管辖权。美国对巴勒斯坦和以色列关系的干预以及单方面迁馆及退约行为构成对国际秩序的破坏,违反国际法。双方应当采取协商、诉讼等和平手段解决争端。The United States recognizes Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and moved its embassy to Jerusalem.The State of Palestine and the United States play a legal game over the legitimacy of the action.Palestine sued the United States in the International Court of Justice.The case is highly controversial both substantively and procedurally.In terms of the standing of the International Court of Justice,Palestine has a position of standing in this case;in terms of the invalidity of the withdrawal of the United States from international treaty in this case,the Court has jurisdiction in this case.The conducts of the United States of intervention in Palestinian-Israeli relations,relocation of U.S.embassy and withdrawal from international treaty constitute a violation of the international relationship,and are also in violation of international law.The Parties shall resolve any disputes by peaceful means such as consultation and litigation.

关 键 词：美国大使馆迁馆 《维也纳外交关系公约》 国际法院诉讼管辖权 

分 类 号：D99[政治法律—国际法学]