顾炎武《唐韵正》“逢”“逄”讹混订误一则  

A Textual Criticism for the Text Error of “Pang(逢)” and “Pang(逄)” in Gu Yanwu’s Tangyunzheng

作　　者：田佳鹭[1] 李烨 Tian Jialu;Li Ye(Institute of Ancient Chinese Language and Documents,Southwest University,Beibei Chongqing 400715,China;School of Humanities and Management Sciences,Southwest Medical University,Sichuan Luzhou 646000,China)

机构地区：[1]西南大学汉语言文献研究所,重庆北碚400715 [2]西南医科大学人文与管理学院,四川泸州646000

出　　处：《中国文字研究》2019年第2期228-230,共3页The Study of Chinese Characters

摘　　要：《唐韵正》在论述"逢"和"逄"的关系时,存在一处本该是"逢"而写成"逄"的讹误,致使文意不通。"逢""逄"讹混,本质上是由二字异体关系导致的,只是《唐韵正》中这一段话恰好是辨析"逢""逄"二字关系的,二者不能互相替换。Gu Yanwu has discussed the relationship of the variant characters "Pang(逢)" and"Pang(逄)" in Tangyunzheng,and there was a text error that mixed " Pang(逢)" and " Pang(逄)"in the sentences of it,so that those sentences are difficult to understand.And that mistake of writing has already existed at the first edition of Tangyunzheng,and it was still common from all versions of the Qing Dynasty to the period of the Republic of China.The reason of mixed "Pang(逢)" and "Pang(逄)" in Tangyunzheng owing to the variant relationship of this two characters.However,just like the situation in Tangyunzheng,variant characters "Pang(逢)" and "Pang(逄)" can’t be replaced each other in the sentences that analyze the relationship of them.Otherwise,these sentences will be difficult to understand.But this kind of text error of " Pang(逢)" and "Pang(逄) " still exists in modern version of Tangyunzheng,and it isn’t corrected by the authors.

关 键 词：《唐韵正》 《隶释》 逢 逄 

分 类 号：H124.1[语言文字—汉语]