欧盟的南中国海政策:解析与评估  被引量:4

EU s South China Sea Policy: Analysis and Evaluation

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:王传剑[1] 孔凡伟[2] WANG Chuanjian;KONG Fanwei(School of Politics and Administration,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin,China;School of International Studies,Tianjin Foreign Studies University,Tianjin,China)

机构地区:[1]天津师范大学政治与行政学院 [2]天津外国语大学国际关系学院

出  处:《东南亚研究》2020年第2期81-99,156,共20页Southeast Asian Studies

基  金:国家社会科学基金重点项目“中国—美国—东盟三边关系互动视阈下南海问题的疏解路径与管控方略研究”(16AGJ008)。

摘  要:自2012年起,欧盟将南海争端列为直接关系其利益的东亚地区安全问题,其政策立场在“南海仲裁案”闹剧牵引下经历了一个变化和调整的过程。欧盟介入南海争端有着多个层面的利益考量,在政策路径的选择方面具有鲜明的欧盟特色,充分体现了其综合性安全路径和“预防性外交”理念。但由于受到多种因素的影响和制约,欧盟在南海问题上只能扮演一种补充性的角色。中欧双方应当从维护全面战略伙伴关系的大局出发,共同推动南海局势朝着趋稳向好方向发展。The EU has listed the South China Sea disputes as a security issue in East Asia that directly related to its interests since 2012.Its policy position has undergone a process of change and adjustment under the traction of the“Arbitration Farce”.The EU's involvement in the South China Sea disputes has many aspects of interest considerations,and has distinct EU characteristics in the choice of the policy path.However,due to the influence and restriction of various factors,it can only play a supplementary role on the South China Sea issue.China and the EU should proceed from the overall situation of maintaining the comprehensive strategic partnership to jointly promote the stable and sound development of the situation in the South China Sea.

关 键 词:欧盟 南海问题 中欧关系 东亚安全 

分 类 号:D993.5[政治法律—国际法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象