检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘琦[1] LIU Qi
出 处:《金融论坛》2020年第5期68-80,共13页Finance Forum
摘 要:本文研究金融周期波动下银行流动性缓冲的调整行为,并采用1999-2018年美国4719家银行的季度面板数据进行实证检验。研究结果表明:第一,银行持有流动性缓冲具有明显的顺周期效应;第二,银行业务特征会影响流动性缓冲的周期性调整:核心存款占比越高、贷款承诺越多的银行波动幅度越大;而批发融资占比越高、对证券化依赖程度越深的银行波动幅度越小;第三,实施LCR监管所带来的改善具有局限性,未纳入监管范围和压力时期的银行顺周期性依然显著。This paper studies the adjustment behaviors of bank liquidity buffer,and empirically tests the effect with the quarterly panel data of 4719 banks in the US during 1999-2008.The results show that(1)banks liquidity buffer is obviously pro-cyclical;(2)bank’s business characteristics would affect the cyclical adjustment of liquidity buffer:banks with higher ratio of core deposit and more loan commitments have larger fluctuations,while banks with higher ratio of wholesale financing and greater dependence on securitization have smaller fluctuations;(3)the benefit of LCR supervision is limited,and bank’s pro-cyclicality is still significant when the bank is without supervision or under pressure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28