锐器伤致疑似(血)气胸重新鉴定1例  

A re-appraised case of suspected pneumothorax(hemopneumothorax) caused by sharp instrument

作　　者：李备栩 江洁清[2] 嵇鸣[3] 薛爱民 LI Bei-xu;JIANG Jie-qing;JI Ming;XUE Ai-min(School of Policing Studies,Shanghai University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201701,China;Department of Forensic Medicine,School of Basic Medical Sciences,Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China;Department of Radiology,Huadong Hospital,Fudan University,Shanghai 200040,China)

机构地区：[1]上海政法学院警务学院,上海201701 [2]复旦大学基础医学院法医学系,上海200032 [3]复旦大学附属华东医院放射科,上海200040

出　　处：《复旦学报（医学版）》2020年第3期456-458,共3页Fudan University Journal of Medical Sciences

基　　金：上海市现场物证重点实验室开放课题(2017XCWZK17)。

摘　　要：在涉及轻伤与轻微伤临界时,如果没有充分证据证明存在更严重的损伤,需要遵循疑伤从轻(无)原则,评定较轻的损伤程度等级。本案是1例胸部锐器伤导致的疑似(血)气胸,因为没有充足证据证明(血)气胸、胸壁贯通伤存在,故无法推翻临床病史记载的刀刺未进入胸腔,遵循疑伤从轻原则,结合损伤后果轻微,最终评定为轻微伤。In the case of minor injury and minor injury criticality,since there is no sufficient evidence to prove that the injury is more serious,the principle of minor(no) injury until proved major injury is followed to appraise the degree of injury.This was a case of suspected pneumothorax(hemopneumothorax) caused by sharp instrument.Because there was no sufficient evidence to prove pneumothorax(hemopneumothorax) or penetrating wound in thoracic wall,or to deny the clinical history of no penetrating wound in thoracic wall.Due to the principle of minor injury until proved major injury and the mild injury consequences,this case was appraised as mildly minor injury.

关 键 词：重新鉴定 锐器伤 (血)气胸 疑伤从轻 

分 类 号：D919.4[医药卫生—法医学]