检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭玲 GUO Ling(Dalian Friendship Hospital,Dalian 116001,China)
出 处:《中国医药指南》2020年第16期256-257,共2页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨运动疗法联合药物干预对老年护理医院骨质疏松患者跌倒风险的作用。方法选择我院70例2017年1月至2018年2月老年骨质疏松患者。随机分组,常规护理服务干预组采取药物干预护理,综合护理服务干预组则采取药物干预+运动疗法治疗。比较两组疾病疗效;老年骨质疏松患者对疾病的认知、预防跌倒的意识;护理前后患者心理焦虑水平、机体免疫力状态、骨密度等情况;跌倒发生率。结果综合护理服务干预组疾病疗效、老年骨质疏松患者对疾病的认知、预防跌倒的意识、心理焦虑水平、机体免疫力状态、骨密度等情况相比较常规护理服务干预组更好,P<0.05。综合护理服务干预组跌倒例次少于常规护理服务干预组,P<0.05。结论药物干预+运动疗法治疗老年可获得较好预后。Objective To explore the effect of exercise therapy combined with drug intervention on the fall risk of patients with osteoporosis in senile care hospital.Methods 70 elderly patients with osteoporosis in our hospital from January 2017 to August 2012 were selected.Randomized,routine nursing intervention group to take drug intervention nursing,comprehensive nursing intervention group to take drug intervention+sports therapy treatment.The efficacy of the two groups was compared.Awareness of disease and prevention of falls in elderly patients with osteoporosis;Psychological anxiety level,body immunity status,bone density and other conditions of patients before and after nursing;Incidence of falls.Results Compared with the conventional nursing intervention group,the comprehensive nursing service intervention group was better in disease efficacy,elderly osteoporosis patients’awareness of disease,consciousness of preventing falls,level of psychological anxiety,body immunity status and bone density,etc.,P<0.05.The number of falls in the comprehensive nursing intervention group was less than that in the conventional nursing intervention group,P<0.05.Conclusion Drug intervention and exercise therapy can achieve better prognosis in senile patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3