检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周湖勇[1] 钱伟 ZHOU Huyong;QIAN Wei(Law School,Wenzhou University,Wenzhou,China 325035)
出 处:《温州大学学报(社会科学版)》2020年第2期66-72,共7页Journal of Wenzhou University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:审判是正义得以实现的程序,从“神判”走向“人判”,并逐步发展成一套完整的规则体系沿用至今。随着互联网、大数据、云计算等技术的发展,传统的审判方式再一次迎来变革,出现了以人工智能为重要司法辅助工具的“智判”模式,这种模式更具备形式上的理性,同时也存在隐忧。司法审判方式有一个嬗变的过程,应当从历史的视角探寻其中的规律,为发展智能裁判提供依据。As the procedure to realize justice,judgment has changed from“divine judgment”to“human judgment”,and gradually developed into a complete set of rules that have been used up to now.With the development of internet,big data,cloud computing and other technologies,the traditional judgment mode once again ushered in a change.The so-called“intelligent judgment”mode,which takes“artificial intelligence”as an important judicial assistant tool,has emerged.This mode is more rational in form,but also has hidden worries.With a process of evolution,judicial judgment has its law of change and development,which should be explored from a historical perspective to provide a basis for the development of intelligent judgment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.5.184