检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:殷祯岑 Yin Zhencen
出 处:《当代修辞学》2020年第3期25-37,共13页Contemporary Rhetoric
基 金:国家社科基金青年项目“汉语语篇意义整合的机制和手段研究”(项目编号:18CYY045)资助;上海师范大学“比较语言学与汉语国际传播”创新团队支持。
摘 要:复杂性范式的兴起,使许多以往被忽视的语篇现象,如成分多向关联、语义整体浮现、语义多元阐释等进入学术视野。对语篇研究复杂性方法的探索,有望让我们超越传统的线性研究方法,实现语篇研究的新进展。要从复杂性角度看语篇,我们就需要对整体语义样态、成分互动方式、语义整合过程等问题进行深入探究,这一点与互文语篇理论的基本假设极为契合。本文以诗歌语篇为例,在互文语篇理论和耗散结构理论的双重视域下探索语篇复杂语义的结构类型和整合规律,试图回答:语篇语义的不同样态是如何在他文本的交织互动中分别实现的。论文以语篇语义的自组织整合过程为线索,设立三个维度六个向度的分析框架,对语篇语义的简单与复杂、明确与含混进行描写、分析,尝试探索语篇语义的多样性与语义整合不同模式之间的对应关系。The rise of the complexity paradigm has brought many previously neglected discourse phenomena into academic horizons. And the study of complexity method allows us to go beyond traditional linear research methods and achieve newprogresses in discourse analysis. To look at discourse from the perspective of complexity,we should make in-depth explorations of the overall semantic structure,the ways of components interaction,and the process of semantic integration,which is in line with the basic assumptions of intertextual discourse theory. Taking the discourse of poetry as an example,this paper expands the research in the dual emphasis of intertextual discourse theory and dissipative structure theory,trying to answer howdo texts enter the discourse space, and according to different intertextual paths, self-organize different semantics structure of discourse. Based on the process of self-organization and integration of discourse semantics,the paper sets up a framework to describe and analyze the simplicity and complexity of discourse semantics, and to find the correspondence between diversity of discourse semantics and models of semantic integration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.0.146