不能犯未遂与不能犯辨析及完善路径--以张筠筠、张筠峰运输毒品案,赵长锁盗窃案为切入点  

Discrimination between Impossible Attempt and Impossibility and Approaches of Perfection: Taking the Case of Transporting Narcotics by Zhang Yunyun and Zhang Yunfeng and the Theft Case by Zhao Changsuo as the Entry Point

作　　者：王帅 Wang Shuai(National Judges College,Beijing 100070,China)

机构地区：[1]国家法官学院刑事审判教研部,北京100070

出　　处：《贵州警察学院学报》2020年第1期25-36,121,共13页Journal of Guizhou Police College

摘　　要：不能犯未遂自德国刑法学者提出以来一直是刑法理论中颇具争议的领域,刑法学者对该问题相当关注。两大法系对不能犯未遂观点悬殊,即便在大陆法系,也存在不同主张。与外国的不能犯学说相比,我国不能犯未遂在理论根基适当、判断层次合理,有助于发挥刑法的规范机能、实现一般预防的目的,判断标准简明、实务操作性强等方面存在优势。应当完善犯罪未遂定义,明确犯罪既遂概念,改进未遂犯处罚方式,使我国不能犯未遂理论更加完善。Impossible attempt,since initially put forward by a German criminal law scholar,has remained controversial in criminal law field and been concerned by criminal law scholars.The two major legal systems take sharply different views over this issue,and even within the civil law system,there are diverse opinions.Compared with the foreign theories on impossibility,China’s theory on impossible attempt has the advantages such as appropriate theoretical foundations and reasonable judgment levels,being conducive to playing the normative function of criminal law and achieving the purpose of general prevention,simple and clear judgment standards,simplifying practical operation and so on.In order to perfect China’s theory on impossible attempt,we should perfect the definition of attempt of crime,clarify the concept of accomplishment of an offense and improve the punishments for attempted offenses.

关 键 词：不能犯未遂 不能犯未遂犯 既遂 客观危险说 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]