检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘浩 LIU Hao(Faculty of Education,Queensland University of Technology,Brisbane QLD4059)
机构地区:[1]昆士兰科技大学教育学院,澳大利亚布里斯班QLD4059
出 处:《比较教育研究》2020年第5期20-26,共7页International and Comparative Education
摘 要:英国高等教育具有良好的国际声誉,这与其顺时施宜的教育政策密不可分。基于批判话语分析的视角对英国高等教育政策的文本特征以及政策制定、实施过程进行系统梳理,发现其政策文本擅于使用被动语态隐藏权力主体、运用名词化结构增强文本权威性、利用情态动词明确权责划分。并且,不同时期的法案在政策内容的生产、分配以及消费方面都体现出政策话语与政治话语、民间话语间的明显互文。在此过程中,不同利益群体共同参与高等教育话语权的争夺,在相互的抗衡与妥协中构建合理的话语秩序。British higher education has a good international reputation,which is closely related to its timely education policy.From the perspective of critical discourse analysis,the text features of British higher education policy as well as the process of policy formulation and implementation are systematically analyzed.It is found that British higher education policy texts are good at using passive voice to hide the power subject,employing nominalization to enhance the authority of policies,and utilizing modal verbs to clarify the division of rights and responsibilities.Moreover,in terms of production,distribution and consumption of policy contents,acts in different periods all showed obvious intertextuality between policy discourse,political discourse and folk discourse.In this process,different interest groups participate in the struggle for the discourse power of higher education,and construct a reasonable discourse order in the mutual confrontation and compromise.
分 类 号:G649.561[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117