检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴仲烨[1] 李玲霞[1] 路喻清[1] 李艳[1] 赵静[2] 张二飞[1] WU Zhong-ye;LI Ling-xia;LU Yu-qing;LI Yan;ZHAO Jing;ZHANG Er-fei(Anesthesiology Department,The Affiliated Hospital of Yan'an University,Yan'an,Shaanxi,716000,China;Intensive Care Unit,The Affiliated Hospital of Yan'an University,Yan'an,Shaanxi,716000,China)
机构地区:[1]延安大学附属医院麻醉科,陕西延安716000 [2]延安大学附属医院重症医学科,陕西延安716000
出 处:《现代生物医学进展》2020年第5期949-952,共4页Progress in Modern Biomedicine
基 金:陕西省社会发展科技攻关项目(2016SF-075)。
摘 要:目的:探究超快通道麻醉辅助脑电双频指数(Bispectral index,BIS)监测对行心脏手术患者认知功能障碍的影响和安全性。方法:选取2014年1月-2017年1月于我院进行心脏手术的59例患者为研究对象,按照随机数字表法将其分为实验组(29例)和对照组(30例)。其中,对照组患者实施心脏超快通道麻醉,实验组患者实施心脏超快通道麻醉辅助BIS监测。术后6个月,使用韦氏成人智力量表对两组麻醉前后认知功能障碍情况进行比对,并比较两组术后6个月内并发症的发生率。结果:(1)两组术后6个月时智力测试得分对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),各指数间对比差异也无统计学意义(P>0.05);(2)实验组患者术后6个月内并发症发生率较对照组显著降低(P<0.05)。结论:与单独使用超快速通道的患者相比,行全身麻醉心脏手术患者使用超快速通道麻醉辅助BIS监测麻醉及单用超快速通道对患者认知功能障碍的影响相当,但前者的安全性明显高于后者。Objective: To investigate the effects of ultrafast anesthesia-assisted BIS monitoring on cognitive dysfunction and the security in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: 59 patients undergoing cardiac surgery in our hospital from January 2014 to January 2017 were selected as experimental subjects and divided into experimental group(n=29) and control group(n=30) according to random number table method. Among them, the control group underwent cardiac ultra-fast channel anesthesia, the experimental group underwent cardiac ultra-fast channel anesthesia assisted BIS monitoring. The Webster’s Adult Intelligence Scale was used to compare the cognitive dysfunction before and after anesthesia. The incidence of complications within 6 months after surgery was compared between the two groups. Results:(1) There was no significant difference in intelligence test scores between the two groups at 6 months after operation(P>0.05), and there was no significant difference between each index(P>0.05);(2) The incidence of postoperative complications in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusions: Compared with the patients using only the ultra-fast channel, the effect of BIS monitoring anesthesia assisted by the ultra-fast channel anesthesia in patients undergoing general anesthesia and the effect of using only the ultra-fast channel anesthesia on the cognitive dysfunction of patients was similar, but the safety of the former was significantly higher than that of the latter.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.138.140.5