检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨绿峰[1,2] 宋沙沙 解威威 张伟[1,2] YANG Lufeng;SONG Shasha;XIE Weiwei;ZHANG Wei(School of Civil Engineering,Guangxi University,Nanning 530004,China;Key Laboratory of Engineering Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety of the Ministry of Education,Guangxi University,Nanning 530004,China;Guangxi Road and Bridge Engineering Group Co.Ltd.,Nanning 530011,China)
机构地区:[1]广西大学土木建筑工程学院,广西南宁530004 [2]广西大学工程防灾与结构安全教育部重点实验室,广西南宁530004 [3]广西路桥工程集团有限公司,广西南宁530011
出 处:《西南交通大学学报》2020年第3期476-484,共9页Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University
基 金:国家自然科学基金(51738004,51478125)。
摘 要:为了克服传统广义屈服函数的局限性,建立了适用于平面和空间框架结构,且对截面几何尺寸不敏感的箱型构件通用齐次广义屈服函数,提出了箱型框架极限承载力分析的高效线弹性迭代方法.首先,通过对比分析遴选出对截面几何参数不敏感的箱型截面广义屈服函数作为基准;然后,根据全面试验法确定了拟合配点,并通过回归分析建立了考虑轴力和双向弯矩联合作用的箱型截面通用齐次广义屈服函数;最后,结合弹性模量缩减策略,提出了箱型截面框架结构极限承载力分析的高效线弹性迭代方法.研究结果表明:建立的箱型截面通用齐次广义屈服函数不仅克服了普通广义屈服函数计算结果不稳定的缺陷,而且克服了现存齐次广义屈服函数存在的对截面几何尺寸敏感且不适用于空间结构等问题;建立的结构极限承载力分析的方法较传统的弹塑性增量分析法相对误差不超过3%,且计算时间不足传统分析法的10%,均表明本文建立方法的精确性和适用性.In order to overcome limitations of the traditional generalized yield function(GYF),a homogeneous generalized yield function(HGYF)is proposed for box sections,which is insensitive to sectional geometry of box sections and applicable for plane and spatial frame structures;and a linear-elastic iterative method with higher efficiency is presented for ultimate bearing capacity of framed structures.Firstly,different generalized yield functions(GYF)are investigated and the suitable one is selected as insensitive to the geometric parameters of box sections.Then a set of fitting points are determined according to the comprehensive test method,based on which an HGYF was developed by regression analysis with a wide range of application for box sections.Finally,a linear-elastic iterative method is presented with high efficiency for the ultimate bearing capacity of frames with box section on the basis of elastic modulus reduction method(EMRM).Numerical examples show that the proposed HGYF achieves satisfying stable results with a wide range of application for plane and spatial frames,overcoming not only the instability of the traditional GYF,but also the sensitivity of the existing HGYF to geometry of sections which is unsuitable for spatial frames.The relative error of the established method is less than 3%compared with the traditional elasto-plastic incremental analysis method,and the calculation time is less than 10%that of the traditional analysis method,which shows the accuracy and efficiency of this method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49