检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:伍方佩 张超[1] Wu Fangpei;Zhang Chao(Department of Dermatology,Changsha Central Hospital,Hunan Changsha 410004)
出 处:《中国社区医师》2020年第16期63-63,65,共2页Chinese Community Doctors
摘 要:目的:比较复方氟米松软膏与卤米松软膏治疗慢性湿疹的临床疗效。方法:2018年11月-2019年4月收治慢性湿疹患者78例,分为两组。A组实施复方氟米松软膏治疗,B组采用卤米松软膏治疗。比较两组疗效。结果:A组治疗总有效率显著优于B组,复发率低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对慢性湿疹患者实施复方氟米松软膏治疗效果优于卤米松软膏。Objective:To compare the clinical effect of compound flumisone ointment and halomisone ointment in the treatment of chronic eczema.Methods:From November 2018 to April 2019,78 patients with chronic eczema were admitted,they were divided into the two groups.The group A was treated with compound flumisone ointment.The group B was treated with halometasone ointment.The curative effect of the two groups was compared.Results:The total effective rate of the group A was significantly higher than that of the group B,and the recurrence rate was lower than that of the group B,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The therapeutic effect of compound flumisone ointment on chronic eczema is better than that of halomisone ointment.
分 类 号:R758.23[医药卫生—皮肤病学与性病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30