形式的政治:自由诗创格与无政府主义的渊源  

The Politics of Form: The Correlation between Formal Reconstructions in Free Verse and Anarchism

作　　者：李国辉[1] Li Guohui(the School of Humanities,Taizhou University,Linhai 317000,Zhejiang Province,China)

机构地区：[1]台州学院人文学院,317000

出　　处：《文艺理论研究》2020年第2期121-129,共9页Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“《风行》杂志与象征主义自由诗的发生、演变研究”[项目编号:18BWW083];国家社科基金重大项目“19世纪西方文学思潮研究”[项目编号:15ZDB086]的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在第三共和国早期的法国,以及一战时期的英国,可以发现自由诗在破格之后寻求创格的现象。自由诗创格表面目的是与散文区别开,更深层的原因是自由诗有着形式无政府主义的"坏血统",它满足自由诗初创时对反诗体的诗体想象。随着法国19世纪末期和英国20世纪初期保守主义思想的活跃,法、英两国的无政府主义面临着有力的挑战。在此背景下,自由诗也开始去除形式无政府主义,以求获得统一的诗体观。但是自由诗的创格本身仍然具有无政府主义的倾向,统一的诗体观并没有真正建立,因而自由诗的创格仍然是一种诗体想象,用以抚平诗体意识的断裂和创伤。Formal reconstruction was a common phenomenon in the early stage of the Third Republic of France and in Britain during the First World War when free verse passed its stage of formal liberation. Rather than differentiating free verse from prose, the deeper rationale of formal reconstruction was that free verse had been contaminated by the "mauvais sang(bad blood)" of aesthetic anarchism that satisfied the poets’ craving for anti-formal poetry in the early stage. As anarchism did not fare very well under the pressure of political conservatism in the late 19 th-century France and 1910 s Britain, free verse, as a result, tried to clean away formal anarchism in order to obtain a unified definition. Because formal reconstruction still has a tendency of anarchism, and the unified conception fails to establish itself, formal reconstruction offers but another means of imagination of verse by which poets could soothe the trauma of a disrupted prosodic heritage.

关 键 词：诗体想象 创格 自由诗 无政府主义 新诗律 

分 类 号：I106.2[文学—世界文学]