主审法官办案责任制的价值预设及其困境应对  

Value Presupposition and Dilemma Response of Presiding Judge’s Case Responsibility System

作　　者：洪泉寿 HONG Quanshou(Zhanjiang Intermediate People's Court,Research Office,Zhanjiang,Guangdong 524000,China)

机构地区：[1]湛江市中级人民法院研究室,广东湛江524000

出　　处：《岭南师范学院学报》2020年第2期79-87,共9页Journal of Lingnan Normal University

摘　　要：主审法官办案责任制由两方面的内容构成,即主审法官拥有独立审理案件且独立做出相应裁判的权利、主审法官应当对其误判担负起对等的法律责任。而改革推进主审法官办案责任制的关键点在于确保主审法官能够充分行使审理权和裁判权。尽管目前在审理权和裁判权的内部独立性及裁判权权责统一性层面均存在着"独立很不充分""责任很不明确"等问题,但认真探究主审法官办案责任制价值实现的内外影响因素,并藉此从合理配置主审法官及合议庭成员之间的权责、严禁法院系统内部人员干预、废除上级领导签发制度和明确审委会权责等方面完善主审法官办案责任制,为顺利推进主审法官办案责任制改革提供理论和实践支撑。The presiding judge’s case responsibility system consists of two aspects, namely, the presiding judge has the right to hear the case and make corresponding decisions independently, as well as to take the equivalent legal responsibility for his misjudgment. The key point of the reform and promotion of this system is to ensure that the presiding judge can fully exercise his right for trial and jurisdiction. Although at present, there are problems such as "insufficient independence" and "unclear responsibility" in the internal independence, and the unity of trial and jurisdiction. However, the internal and external factors that influence the realization of the value of the system will be carefully explored, and the system will be improved by reasonably allocating the power and responsibilities between the presiding judge and the members of the collegial panel, prohibiting the interference of personnels within the court system, abolishing the superior leaders’ issuing system and clarifying the power and responsibilities of the trial committee. It provides theoretical and practical support for the reform of the case responsibility system of the presiding judge.

关 键 词：主审法官 办案责任制 价值预设 审判权统一 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]