检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵敏生 杜国聪 陈铭 毛萍 ZHAO Min-sheng;DU Guo-cong;CHEN Ming(Zhaoqing Gaoyao District People’s Hospital,Zhaoqing 526000,China)
机构地区:[1]肇庆市高要区人民医院,526000
出 处:《中国实用医药》2020年第15期27-29,共3页China Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的对比对闭合性胫腓骨骨折患者分别应用开放固定手术、髓内钉固定手术以及微创经皮钢板内固定(MIPPO)技术治疗的临床效果。方法选取90例闭合性胫腓骨骨折患者作为临床研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组1组、对照2组、观察组,每组30例。对照1组接受开放固定手术治疗,对照2组接受髓内钉固定手术治疗,观察组接受MIPPO技术治疗。比较三组患者的治疗效果及不良反应发生情况。结果治疗5个月后,观察组总有效率96.67%显著高于对照1组的53.33%和对照2组的66.67%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照2组的治疗总有效率高于对照1组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,观察组不良反应发生率0显著低于对照1组的26.67%和对照2组的13.33%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照2组的不良反应发生率低于对照1组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论相比于开放固定手术、髓内钉固定手术治疗,给予闭合性胫腓骨骨折患者应用MIPPO技术治疗效果更佳,更利于患者术后恢复,应用价值较高。Objective To compare the clinical effect of open fixation,intramedullary nail fixation and minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis(MIPPO)technique in patients with closed fracture.Methods A total of 90 patients with closed fracture were divided into control group 1,control group 2 and observation group by random number table method,with 30 cases in each group.The control group 1 was treated by open fixation,and control group 2 was treated by intramedullary nail fixation,and the observation group was treated by MIPPO technique.The therapeutic effect and occurrence of adverse reactions were compared among the three groups.Results After 5 months of treatment,the total effective rate 96.67%of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group 1 53.33% and control group 2 66.67%, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The total effective rate of control group 2 was higher than that of control group 1, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). After treatment, the incidence of adverse reactions 0 of the observation group was significantly lower than that of control group 1 26.67% and control group 2 13.33%, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions of control group 2 was lower than that of control group 1, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with open fixation and intramedullary nail fixation, MIPPO technique shows better therapeutic effect for patients with closed fracture of tibia and fibula, which is more conducive to the postoperative recovery of patients and has higher application value.
关 键 词:闭合性胫腓骨骨折 微创经皮钢板内固定技术 髓内钉固定手术 开放固定手术
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.52