政治学研究方法的演进逻辑与趋势——基于中外政治学期刊的文献计量分析  

Evolutionary Logic and Trend of Political Science Research Methods——Based on Bibliometric Analysis of Chinese and Foreign Political Science Journals

作　　者：王炳权[1] Wang Bingquan(Institute of Political Science, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100732)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院政治学研究所,北京100732

出　　处：《华中师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2020年第3期1-19,共19页Journal of Central China Normal University:Humanities and Social Sciences

摘　　要：本文基于中外政治学研究方法演进历程的文献综述与中外政治学期刊的文献计量分析,得出以下结论:中文与外文的政治学研究成果在研究方法类型上存在显著差异;实证方法尤其是定量分析方法的运用是一种趋势;我国政治学的混合研究方法有待提升,具体研究方法的种类还比较单一。我国未来的政治学研究方法应从四个方面进行提升:实现定性与定量研究的共同发展;不能陷入“唯方法论”的泥潭;增加期刊对专著介绍的版块;研究方法的运用应朝着全球化与本土化相结合的方向发展。Based on the literature reviews about evolution of Chinese and foreign political science research methods and the bibliometric analysis in Chinese and foreign political science journals,this paper draws the following conclusions.There are significant differences in the types of research methods between Chinese and foreign political science research results.It is a trend to use empirical methods,especially quantitative analysis methods.Research methods of political science in China,especially the mixed research methods,need to be improved,and the types of specific research methods are relatively simple.In the future,China’s political science research methods need to be improved in four aspects.The methods should achieve the common development between qualitative and quantitative research.The methods can’t fall in the mire of“methodology only”.The introductions of monographs need to be increased in journals.Application of the research methods should be headed the direction that is globalization and localization into a combined development.

关 键 词：政治学研究 研究方法 定量分析 定性分析 全球化 本土化 

分 类 号：G23[文化科学]