袁枚性灵诗学视野下的江西诗学  

The Jiangxi Poetics in the Vision of Yuan Mei’s Poetics of Natural Disposition

作　　者：吴晟 WU Sheng(Chinese Language and Culture College,Guangdong University of Foreign Studies Nan Guo Business School,Guangzhou 510545,China)

机构地区：[1]广东外语外贸大学南国商学院中国语言文化学院,广东广州510545

出　　处：《佛山科学技术学院学报（社会科学版）》2020年第2期20-26,共7页Journal of Foshan University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(16FZW005)。

摘　　要：与格调说与肌理说对抗,袁枚标举性灵说,反对以经学、考据的学问入诗,认为它汩没性情。鉴于文字之祸,黄庭坚倡导诗歌抒写情性,反对怒邻骂坐。尽管两人诗学背景不同,所倡性情一也。在传达技巧上,两人都追求“大巧”之“朴”,袁氏更看重天分,黄氏较强调人巧。袁枚首肯黄庭坚学唐变唐、学杜而不为的创新精神,承认其卓然为大家,对其诗歌创作音律拗涩、槎枒粗硬、用典冷僻等若干弊病予以针砭。体现了他比较辩证多元的诗学思想,和对江西诗学相对客观公允的批评态度。In order to oppose Shen Deqian’s Style Theory and Weng Fang gang’s Texture Theory,Yuan Mei proposes the Personality Theory to against the use of Confucian classics and textual research in poems because it stifle temperament.In consideration of the calamity of words,Huang Tingjian advocates the use of poems to express disposition and against to criticize somebody or something strongly.Although they have different poetic background,they are the same in advocating the use of poems to express disposition.In expression skill,they all pursuit the ingenious plain,but Yuan Mei emphasizes talent and Huang Tingjian emphasizes the superb skills.Yuan Mei acknowledges Huang Tingjian as the great poet and identify with his creative spirit that learn and change from Tang dynasty and Du Fu.What’s more,he criticizes Huang Tingjian for his stiff swing,not tidiness,unfamiliar allusions and so on.However,it reflects his dialectical and pluralistic poetics thought and he has an objective critical attitude about Jiangxi Poetics.

关 键 词：袁枚 性灵诗学 江西诗学 

分 类 号：I207.22[文学—中国文学]