公司解散纠纷的可仲裁性研究--以中外合资经营企业解散纠纷为中心  

Study on Arbitrability of Company Dissolution Dispute--The Center is the Dispute over Dissolution of Chinese-foreign Joint Venture

作　　者：王利香 Wang Lixiang

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《北京仲裁》2019年第4期94-116,共23页Beijing Arbitration Quarterly

摘　　要：公司解散纠纷的可仲裁性问题属于中国特色问题,包括《公司法》有限责任公司僵局时或中外合资经营企业合营者违约导致合营基础解除时产生的公司解散纠纷的可仲裁性问题,在理论和实践中存在着较大的争议。充分考证中外可仲裁性标准后,公司合同、公司自治及司法慎入等理论支持了公司解散纠纷的可仲裁性,对此持否定态度的公司社会责任、仲裁的保密性及不具仲裁合意等主张则难以服众,尤其中外合资经营企业自身特点决定了判断仲裁合意是否存在的独特思维。为避免矛盾裁判的出现,应在抽象层面肯定公司解散纠纷的可仲裁性,并结合具体案情,增加阐明权以实现仲裁与诉讼程序的良好衔接。Falling within the scope of Chinese characteristics,the problems on arbitrability of the company dissolution dispute include arbitrability under the PRC Company Law caused by the deadlock of limited liability company in company law or breach of joint venture contract.After fully researching into the standards of domestic and foreign arbitration,theories like company contract,company autonomy and judicial silence can support the arbitrability of the company dissolution dispute.Negative claims such as the corporate social responsibility,arbitration confidentiality and the non-existence of arbitration consensus are not persuasive,especially in respect of sino-foreign joint venture,which has unique thinking routin when considering the existance of consensus to arbitration.In order to avoid the appearance of contradictory adjudication,arbitrability of the company dissolution dispute should be affirmed at the abstract level,and the right of clarification should be reinforced in combination with the specific case to achieve a good connection between arbitration and litigation.

关 键 词：公司解散纠纷 可仲裁性 合营企业 公司僵局仲裁合意 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]