检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李世军 龙小英 LI Shijun;LONG Xiaoying(School of Humanities and Law,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230009,China)
出 处:《安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2020年第3期69-74,共6页Journal of Anhui Agricultural University:SOC.SCI.
摘 要:育种创新是贯彻创新驱动发展战略的重要内容之一,保障育种创新就需要完善植物新品种产权保护体系。正启动修改的《中华人民共和国植物新品种保护条例》有关植物新品种权内容中对“农民特权”的具体规定较为模糊,导致农民超越“特权”而侵犯品种权人利益的现象屡有发生,即品种权人权利与“农民特权”一直存在博弈。建议通过界定享有自繁自用权利的主体、限制自繁自用的种植规模、限制自繁自用的品种类型、制定科学合理的自繁自用种子销售监管方案等措施完善“农民特权”规则。Breeding innovation is an important part of implementing the innovation-driven development,and to guarantee breeding innovation needs to improve the property right protection system of new plant varieties.In the Regulation of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of New Varieties of Plants,which is now under revision,some specific provisions about“farmers’privilege”are relatively vague.As a result,it often happens that farmers overstep their privilege and infringe the interests of variety owners,and in that way there always appears the game between variety owners’right and“farmers’privilege”.This study suggests that the regulations about the privilege can be improved by defining the subject who enjoys the right of self propagating and self using,limiting the planting scale and the varieties of self propagating and self using,and formulating a scientific and reasonable sales supervision scheme for self-propagating and self-using seeds.
关 键 词:《国际植物新品种保护公约》 农民特权 品种权 自繁自用
分 类 号:D922.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.14.145.78