地方法制规范性的论证路径--基于规范性来源问题史的考察  

The Argumentation Path of the Normativity of Local Legal System:Based on a Review of the Problematic History of the Source of Normativity

作　　者：严文俊[1] Yan Wen-jun

机构地区：[1]浙江大学光华法学院

出　　处：《苏州大学学报（法学版）》2020年第2期87-100,共14页Journal of Soochow University：Law Edition

摘　　要：地方法制合法性、正当性的证成,离不开适当的论证路径。论证路径的建构,需要藉由对规范性来源问题史的反思和回顾来完成。从合理理解的内在主义立场出发,规范性并非来源于外部实在,也并非来源于个人意志,而是来源于主体间共识。从主体间共识出发,地方法制的规范证成应当立足于商谈理论展开。鉴于地方法制兼具"规则"和"地方自主"这两个面向,因此地方法制合法性、正当性的规范证成同时包含两个方面,分别是规则规范性的证成和地方自主性的证成,它们都需要借助商谈理论来完成。The justification of the legitimacy of local legal system shall has an appropriate path.The construction of this path needs shall be accplolishment with the precondition of reviewing the problematic history of the source of normativity.From the reasonable understanding of the standpoint of internalist,normativity does not originate from external reality,nor from individual will,but from consensus among subjects.Starting from the consensus among the subjects,the justification of local legal system shall rely on the discourse theory.In reality,the local legal system has two key elements,“rules”and“local autonomy”.Therefore,the justification of the local legal system contains two assignments,namely the justification of the normativity of rules,and the justification of local autonomy,both of them required by the discourse theory.

关 键 词：地方法制 规范性 主体间共识 商谈 

分 类 号：D920.0[政治法律—法学]