检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赖泽荣 王帆 方小丹[2,3] 周靖 LAI Zerong;WANG Fan;FANG Xiaodan;ZHOU Jing(Architectural Design and Research Institute of Guangdong Province,Guangzhou 510010,China;Architecture Design&Research Institute,SCUT,Guangzhou 510640,China;State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science,SCUT,Guangzhou 510640,China)
机构地区:[1]广东省建筑设计研究院,广州510010 [2]华南理工大学建筑设计研究院有限公司,广州510640 [3]华南理工大学亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室,广州510640
出 处:《建筑结构》2020年第10期51-58,共8页Building Structure
基 金:广州市节能专项基金(J-2016-01),华南理工大学亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室项目(2017KC18)。
摘 要:为研究钢管混凝土剪力墙-板结构体系的抗震性能,对一个比例为1∶8的结构缩尺模型进行模拟地震振动台试验,得到试验模型在4个不同强度水平地震作用下的损伤和位移等宏观地震反应。试验结果表明:结构在多遇地震作用下表现出较大的抗震刚度,在罕遇、极罕遇地震作用下弹塑性发展充分,表现出良好的抗震延性,满足"小震不坏、中震可修、大震不倒"的抗震设防标准;钢管混凝土剪力墙构件在试验过程中未发现损坏,是结构良好延性的保证;板-墙连接节点是结构抗震的薄弱部位。在试验基础上,分别建立新型板-墙结构和传统板-墙结构两个分析模型,进行数值模拟分析对比。结果显示新型板-墙结构在地震作用下刚度退化更慢,极限承载力更高,延性发展充分,具有更好的抗震性能。In order to study the seismic performance of steel tube-confined concrete shear wall and slab structural system, a scale-up model with a scale of 1∶8 was tested on a shaking table to obtain the macro seismic responses of the structure, such as the damage and displacement, under the action of four different seismic intensity levels. The test results show that the structure has a large seismic stiffness under the action of frequent earthquakes, a full development of elastoplasticity under the action of rare and extremely rare earthquakes, and a good seismic ductility, which meets the seismic fortification standard of "not damage under the frequent earthquake, repairable under the fortification earthquake, and not collapsing under the rare earthquake";the steel tube-confined concrete shear wall component has not been found damaged in the test process, which is the guarantee of good ductility of the structure;the slab-wall joint is the weak position of the structure. On the basis of the test, two analytical models of the new-type slab-wall structure and the traditional slab-wall structure were established respectively, and the numerical simulation analysis and comparison were carried out. The results show that the rigidity degradation of the new-type slab-wall structure is slower, the ultimate bearing capacity is higher, the ductility development is sufficient, and the seismic performance is better.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38