SF-36量表评价新疆图瓦成人生命质量的信度效度  被引量:20

Reliability and validity of SF-36 scale for evaluating the quality of life of Tuva adults in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:王珊[1] 夏云婷[1] 陈国良[1] 林军建[2] 达拉 于建[1] 胡海娟 李昊天 Wang Shan;Xia Yunting;Chen Guoliang;Lin Junjian;Da La;Yu Jian;Hu Haijuan;Li Haotian(National Center for Rural Water Supply Technical Guidance,Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Beijing 102200,China;Plague Prevention Division,the Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region,Urumqi 830011,China;Hemu Hanas Township Health Center,Burqin County,Altay City,Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region,Altay 836600,China)

机构地区:[1]中国疾病预防控制中心农村改水技术指导中心,北京102200 [2]新疆维吾尔自治区疾病预防控制中心鼠疫防治科,乌鲁木齐830002 [3]新疆维吾尔自治区阿勒泰布尔津县禾木哈纳斯乡卫生院,阿勒泰836600

出  处:《卫生研究》2020年第3期422-426,433,共6页Journal of Hygiene Research

摘  要:目的评价SF-36生活质量量表用于测量新疆图瓦成人生活质量的信度和效度。方法采用多阶段抽样的方法,于2016年在新疆阿勒泰地区哈巴河县白哈巴村和布尔津县喀纳斯、禾木村,随机抽取了437名图瓦成年人作为调查对象(男性227人,女性210人;18~29岁占30.66%、30~49岁占54.00%、≥50岁占15.33%)。使用SF-36量表评价生命质量,用内部一致性信度和折半信度评价量表信度;采用集合效度、区分效度和结构效度评价量表的效度。结果SF-36量表的Cronbach’α系数为0.838,删除相应维度后的Cronbach’α系数均>0.750。Spearman-Brown系数为0.828。集合、区分效度定标试验成功率分别为100%和99.59%。将35个条目纳入探索性因子分析,用最大平衡化旋转法提取7个公因子,累计贡献率为68.97%。将8维度纳入探索性因子分析,提取2个公因子,累计贡献率为66.44%。验证性因子分析模型拟合结果不理想。结论SF-36量表用于评价新疆图瓦成年人生活质量有良好的信度、集合与区分效度,结构效度有待提高。OBJECTIVE To assess the reliability and validity of SF-36 scale in measuring quality of life of Tuva adults in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.METHODS A total of 437 Tuva adults were selected by multistage sampling method,in Tuva families lived in Baihaba Village Habahe county and Kanasi and Hemu Villages Buerjin County in Artay Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region in 2016,including 100 males and 50 females,the three age groups 18-29,30-49,50 and above accounted for 30.66%,54.00%and 15.33%respectively.SF-36 scale was be used to measure the quality of life.The scale’s reliability was assessed by internal consistency reliability and half-fold reliability,and the validity was assessed by set validity,discriminate validity and structural validity.RESULTS The Cronbach’sαcoefficient of the SF-36 scale was 0.838,and all of the Cronbach’sαcoefficients were more than 0.750 after corresponding dimensions were deleted.The Spearman-Brown coefficient was 0.828.The achievement ratio of aggregation tests and discrimination tests were 100%and 99.59%,respectively.Thirty-five items were included in EFA.Seven common factors were extracted through maximum balanced rotation method,and the cumulative contribution rate was 68.97%.Eight-dimensional data were included in EFA,and two common factors were extracted with a cumulative contribution rate of 66.44%.The fitting degree of confirmatory factor analysis model is invalid.CONCLUSION SF-36 has showed a good reliability,set validity and discrimination validity in evaluating the quality of life of Tuva adults in Xinjiang,but its structural validity needs to be improved.

关 键 词:SF-36量表 信度 效度 图瓦人 成年人 少数民族 

分 类 号:R195[医药卫生—卫生统计学] R181.34[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象