检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李文韬 Li Wentao(Department of Economic Management,Jinshan College,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou 350002)
机构地区:[1]福建农林大学金山学院经济管理系,福建福州350002
出 处:《中阿科技论坛(中英文)》2020年第4期15-16,28,共3页China-Arab States Science and Technology Forum
摘 要:报复是WTO争端解决机制中不执行WTO裁决的救济措施,其目的在于敦促败诉方及时有效地执行WTO裁决。交叉报复是WTO开创的一种新的、实践操作性非常强的制度,跨TRIPS协定交叉报复是其中之一。目前适用跨TRIPS协定交叉报复的案件有三起,均是发展中国家提请对发达国家的报复,然而这三起案件最终都没有真正实施TRIPS协定下的报复措施。究其原因纷繁复杂,其中亦体现了发展中国家适用跨TRIPS协定交叉报复的困境。本文拟通过解读对三起案件的解读,为发展中国家适用跨TRIPS协定交叉报复的困境提供初步解决之道。Retaliation is a remedy for the failure to implement WTO rulings in the WTO dispute settlement mechanism.Its purpose is to urge the losing party to enforce the WTO ruling in a timely and effective manner.Cross retaliation is a new and practical system created by WTO,and cross trips agreement is one of them.At present,there are three cases of cross retaliation under the TRIPS Agreement,all of which are from developing countries to developed countries.However,none of the three cases actually implement the retaliation measures under the TRIPS Agreement.The reasons are complicated,which also reflects the dilemma of cross retaliation in developing countries.This paper intends to provide a preliminary solution to the dilemma of cross retaliation in developing countries through the interpretation of three cases.
关 键 词:跨TRIPS协定交叉报复 适用现状 困难与解决
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.226.47