检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苏婉 张文娟 张宇峰[1,2] SU Wan;ZHANG Wenjuan;ZHANG Yufeng(Tianjin Key Laboratory of Water Quality Science and Technology, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China;State Key Laboratory of Membrane Separation and Membrane Process, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300387, China)
机构地区:[1]天津城建大学水质科学与技术天津市重点实验室,天津300384 [2]天津工业大学省部共建分离膜与膜过程国家重点实验室,天津300387
出 处:《膜科学与技术》2020年第3期14-21,共8页Membrane Science and Technology
基 金:天津市教委科研计划项目(2018KJ161);天津城建大学博士科研启动基金资助项目;天津市水质科学与技术重点实验室开放研究基金资助项目(TJKLAST-PT-2018-02);天津市科技重大专项与工程计划(17ZXSTSF00040)。
摘 要:采用聚多巴胺(PDA)与聚乙烯亚胺(PEI)共沉积和分步沉积两种方法对聚砜(PSf)基膜进行改性,对比两种方法改性后纳滤膜性能的差异.对改性前后膜的接触角、通量、截留率及稳定性进行了测试,并通过SEM、AFM、ATR-FTIR、XPS等方法对改性前后膜表面形貌结构、官能团种类、元素组成等进行表征.结果表明,改性时间为8 h时,PDA与PEI分步沉积改性后的膜接触角为49.85°,小于共沉积的68.55°;对MgSO4的截留率为95.2%,高于共沉积改性后的83.0%,但分步沉积对膜通量的影响更大.连续7 d的过滤实验表明两种方法改性后的纳滤膜的盐渗透通量和截留率具有长期稳定性.Zeta电位显示两种沉积方法均使膜表面电负性降低.膜表面表征表明两种方法均能使PDA与PEI交联涂层牢牢黏附在PSf基膜上,但两种改性方法的反应机理有所不同:PDA/PEI共沉积更易发生Schiff base反应,而分步沉积法更倾向于发生Michael addition反应.研究结果对于不同功能改性膜的发展提供理论基础,为PSf膜表面改性提供参考依据.Polydopamine(PDA)and polyethylenimine(PEI)co-deposition and step deposition were used to modify the polysulfone(PSf)membrane,and the performance differences of the modified nanofiltration(NF)membrane were compared.The contact angle,flux,rejection,and stability of the modified membranes were tested.The surface morphology,functional groups and element composition of the modified membranes were characterized by SEM,AFM,ATR-FTIR and XPS,etc.The results showed that after modification for 8 h,the contact angle of PDA and PEI step deposition modified membrane was 49.85°,less than 68.55°of the membrane with PDA/PEI co-deposition.The rejection of MgSO4 were 95.2%,which was higher than 83.0%of the co-deposition,but step deposition had a greater impact on membrane flux.The continuous filtration experiments for seven days showed that the salt permeation flux and rejection rate of the modified NF membranes by the two methods had long-term stability.The Zeta potential showed that both deposition methods caused the membrane surface potential becoming less negative.The characterization of the membranes showed that both methods could make PDA and PEI cross-linked coatings stick firmly to PSf base membrane,but the reaction mechanisms of the two modification methods are different:PDA/PEI co-deposition was more inclined to Schiff base reaction,while step deposition method was more prone to Michael addition reaction.The results provide a theoretical basis for the development of different functional modified membranes and a reference for the surface modification of PSf membranes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222