关于《藏文白话报》等系列报刊的重新考查与认识  

Re-examination and Understanding of the “Colloquial Tibetan Paper” and other Newspapers

作　　者：陈航行[1] 王旭瑞[2] 李钰琪 Chen Hangxing;Wang Xurui;Li Yuqi(School of Journalism and Communication,Xizang Minzu University,Xianyang,Shaanxi,712082)

机构地区：[1]西藏民族大学新闻传播学院,陕西咸阳712082 [2]陕西省社会科学院社会学所,陕西西安710065

出　　处：《西藏民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第1期40-49,155,共11页Journal of Xizang Minzu University：Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：西藏自治区社科基金重点项目“西藏网络舆情分析研判与社会治理问题研究”(项目号:17AXW001)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：民国初期蒙藏事务局主办的《藏文白话报》等系列报刊,奠定了我国少数民族新闻事业发展的坚实基础。然而由于史料缺损、材料收集困难等原因,学界对《藏文白话报》总编纂、期刊数目以及办报理念、风格、舆论制造等问题认识模糊,甚至以讹传讹。本文通过蒙、藏、回文白话报等三刊对比,借助相关史料还原媒介真相,认为徐敬熙作为首任总编纂具有开创性的历史贡献,吴燕绍接任之后经营有方从而拓展了报刊的传播面向,使之进入昌盛时期,左霈续任后的"改良"没有产生积极意义,反而造成期刊的全面衰落。与之相关的舆论制造,受到总编志趣、时代背景、国际关系等诸多复杂因素的影响。This article compares three Colloquial journals, including Mongolian, Tibetan, and Hui, so as to retrieve the truth of the media with relevant historical data. It points out that Xu Jingxi, the first Editor in chief had made groundbreaking historical contributions, Wu Yanshao took up the job and managed well so that expanded the coverage of newspaper and brought it into its heyday, Zuo Pei’s "Improvement" had no positive meaning, instead it caused the overall decline of the journal. The associated public opinion making was affected by many complex factors such as the interest of the Editor in chief, time background, international relations and so on.

关 键 词：藏文白话报 徐敬熙 舆论 

分 类 号：G219.29[文化科学—新闻学]