检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙楚仁[1,2] 梁晶晶 Sun Churen;Liang Jinking
机构地区:[1]西南财经大学国际商学院,611130 [2]广东外语外贸大学广东国际战略研究院
出 处:《世界经济》2020年第6期99-122,共24页The Journal of World Economy
基 金:国家社科重大项目“‘一带一路’区域价值链构建与中国产业转型升级研究”(18ZDA039);国家自科重点项目“中国企业国际化与制度演进”(71832012)的资助。
摘 要:本文将2005年多种纤维协定(MFA)配额限制取消这一事件作为外生冲击,使用2000-2006年中国海关进出口统计数据中的纺织业出口企业面板数据,采用双重差分法考察了与出口企业空间邻近是否会导致企业出口目的地更邻近。研究结果表明,与出口到原MFA配额限制国家企业更邻近的企业在MFA配额限制取消后更可能出口到与这些国家相邻的市场。此外,与出口到原MFA配额限制国家的企业更邻近,可能导致企业因竞争效应直接出口到与这些国家邻近的市场。这一结论对中国促进企业开拓新市场及出口增长具有重要政策意义。This paper employs the difference-in-differences(DID)estimation technique,the quota restriction of the multi-fibre arrangement(MFA)lifted in 2005 as exogenous shock,and the panel data of textile export firms from China s Customs Import and Export Statistics between 2000 and 2006 to investigate whether spatial adjacency to exporting companies would bring corporate export destinations closer.Empirical results show that firms adjacent to those used to export to countries with pre-2005 MFA quotas were more likely to export to neighbouring countries after the MFA quota restrictions were lifted.A closer analysis shows that greater proximity to firms exporting to countries with original MFA quotas may have led firms to directly export to countries adjacent to MFA quota-restricted countries due to competition effects.These results have significant policy implications for China with regard to encouraging firms to develop new markets and increase their exports.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49