检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:雷磊[1] Lei Lei
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学法学院
出 处:《复印报刊资料(法理学、法史学)》2019年第2期3-21,共19页JURISPRUDENCE AND HISTORY OF LAW
基 金:“中国政法大学优秀中青年教师培养支持资助项目”阶段性成果。
摘 要:法哲学所面对的最大批评在于与部门法学及司法实践的疏离。部门法学知识的主体是法教义学,而法哲学是关于法的一般哲学理论,两者间的关系主要体现在疑难案件的场合。在法概念论的层面上,法概念争议会影响疑难案件中法律规范之效力的认定,这可能但不必然会影响裁判结论,但必然会影响判决的整个论证和说理的思路。在法学方法论的层面上,法律适用基本模式的分歧会造成裁判论证方式上的重要区分,司法哲学立场的差异可能会对相同的案件得出不同的裁判结论。在法伦理学的层面上,规范伦理学立场间的对立会影响个案的裁判后果。总之,法哲学的作用方式是间接的而不是直接的,通常在法教义学框架和体系内发挥作用;它旨在复杂化而非简化论证,试图揭示问题背后深层而复杂的理论分歧。The most serious critique that legal philosophy faces is its alienation from specific laws and judicial practices.While the mainstream tradition of specific laws is that of legal dogmatics,legal philosophy constitutes a general theory of philosophy about law,whose relationship manifests itself clearly in hard cases.In the domain of concept of law,the disputes about concept of law have an impact on the validity of a legal norm,which can,but do not necessarily influence judicial decision,although they will certainly affect the way of argumentation and reasoning in the whole decision procedure.In the domain of legal methodology,the divergence on basic model of legal application makes an important difference in way of judicial argumentation,and the discrepancy in judicial philosophy may lead to different conclusion in the same case.In the domain of legal ethics,the antagonism between different standpoints in normative ethics will have impact on judicial consequences.In short,legal philosophy functions in an indirect way,which usually plays a part in the framework and system of legal dogmatics;and it aims to make the arguments more complicated,not more simplified,which tries to reveal the deep and intricate theoretical disagreements behind the controversies of doctrinal problems.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.57