检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨依 Yang Yi
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院
出 处:《复印报刊资料(法理学、法史学)》2019年第6期80-91,共12页JURISPRUDENCE AND HISTORY OF LAW
摘 要:逮捕制度与中华法制文明共生共存,并在不同的历史阶段呈现出不同的时代特征。中国古代逮捕制度突出体现了惩治犯罪、以法治民与维护皇权的功能导向。近代以来逮捕制度的转型,逐步建立起了与公民人身自由保障之间的制度性联系。在经历了建构、调整、恢复和完善等发展阶段后,当代中国的逮捕制度正面临着法治化与现代化的重大命题。应在人权保障与程序正义的观念指引下建构逮捕的程序性控制机制,实现从“逮捕中心”到“审判中心”的制度转变,并强化检察审查职能。The arrest system and the Chinese legal civilization coexist with each other and the different characteristics of arrest were showed in different times.The function of ancient arrest system in China served to punish crime,govern people and maintain the rule,but the transformation of modem times established the links between arrest system and human rights protection.After the construction,correction and improvement,the arrest system of contemporary China is faced with important proposition of legalization and modernization.The implementation of arrest system procedural control should follow the Procedural justice and human rights protection,at the same time,realize the transformation from"arrest as the center"to"trial as the center",and strengthen the prosecutorial examination.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49