检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张于杰圣 ZHANG Yujiesheng(Law School,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)
出 处:《西安体育学院学报》2020年第3期283-290,共8页Journal of Xi'an Physical Education University
摘 要:体育自治作为西方发达国家体育法治化的先进成果,对我国的体育发展具有充分的借鉴意义。但是,由于中外体制的巨大差异,特别是宪法体制的区别,以及西方体育自治固有的缺陷,使得西方国家体育自治发展经验无法直接植入中国,而需要进行相应的本土化调试。我国体育自治应当以重视其自主性能力和发挥国家介入在其中的基础性作用作为本土化要义,并通过国家介入体育自治的法定化与体育自治的自主性能力提升等具体路径,来实现体育自治的本土化,推动中国体育法治化的发展进程。As an achievement of Western countries’ legalization of sports, sports autonomy provides a reference for China’s sports legal development.However, there are obvious differences in systems between China and the West, especially the constitutional system.Meanwhile, western sports autonomy has its own inherent limitations.Thus, their experience cannot be transplanted directly into China.Certain adjustments need to be made in accordance with local circumstances.Sports autonomy in China should focus on self-determination and state intervention.Through the legalization of state intervention and the enhancement of self-determined capability, the localization of sports autonomy will be realized and the development of China’s legalization of sports will be forwarded.
分 类 号:D912.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33