检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任英华[1] 丁浩珂 王星 Ren Yinghua;Ding Haoke;Wang Xing(College of Finance and Statistics,Hunan University,Changsha 410000,China)
出 处:《工业技术经济》2020年第7期13-21,共9页Journal of Industrial Technological Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“复杂网络视角下系统性金融风险的统计监测研究”(项目编号:19BTJ024)。
摘 要:本文利用TVP-FAVAR模型实证检验经济新常态下价格型货币政策工具的动态有效性。研究表明,在“新常态”的宏观环境下,利率对价格调控滞后3阶有效,随着利率市场化进程推进,2018年利率调控的时滞效应消除,且对价格和产出水平均能有效调控;汇率不能对价格和产出进行有效调控;利率对固定资产投资、房地产投资、进出口、贷款、股票市场等的调控效果较好,而汇率对社会消费品零售总额、进出口、股票市场等调控效果较好。总的来说,利率调控的效果比汇率调控的效果更好。The TVP-FAVAR model is used to empirically study the dynamic effectiveness of China's price-based monetary policy.The results show that:under the“new normal”,the regulation of interest rate to price level lags behind the third order.With the passage of time,the time lag effect of interest rate regulation in 2018 is eliminated,and the price and output level can be effective regulation;the effectiveness of exchange rate regulation on output and price levels is not significant;interest rate has a better regulatory effect of fixed asset investment,real estate investment,import,export,loans,Shanghai composite index,Shanghai market capitalization and so on,while exchange rate policy has a better regulatory effect of retail sales of consumer goods,import,export,Shanghai composite index,Shanghai market capitalization and so on.In general,the regulatory effect of interest rate is better than the regulatory effect of exchange rate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49