值得学界关注和探讨的著述--对妥建清教授《颓废审美风格与晚明现代性研究》的学术批评  

A Criticism of"The Study of the Decadent Aesthetic Style and the Modernity in the Late Ming Dynasty"by Jianqing Tuo

作　　者：郑惠生[1] ZHENG Hui-sheng(Department of Humanities and Social Sciences,Shantou Polytechnic,Shantou,Guangdong,515041)

机构地区：[1]汕头职业技术学院人文社科系,广东汕头515041

出　　处：《新疆大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第4期108-116,共9页Journal of Xinjiang University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“百年中国文学传播史的书写问题研究”(18AZD032)。

摘　　要：妥建清教授撰写的《颓废审美风格与晚明现代性研究》一书,以丰厚的积累为根基、以思想的创新为动力、以不止于"目的便是演示晚清作家之革新能力"为目的、以"中国现代性"产生的自律论为立场、以"颓废审美"为焦点、以"对话-论辩"为主要方式,较充分地展现并深刻阐释了文学乃至审美维度上晚明的巨大变化。可以说,在其目标领域里,难见有将如此开阔的视野、高度的思辨、清晰的表达和鲜明的个性四者熔铸成浑然一体的著述。仅从"思想、继承、创新、规范、逻辑、风格"一样都不缺的这一点来讲,它就足以成为后学者的楷模,也可成为学术同行严格"自律"时的一面镜子。"The Study of the Decadent Aesthetic Style and the Modernity in the Late Ming Dynasty"written by Professor Jianqing Tuo,based on rich academic accumulation,fully shows and profoundly explains the great changes in literature and even in the aesthetic dimension of the late Ming Dynasty.It takes innovation as the motive,aiming beyond"the purpose of demonstrating the innovative ability of writers in the late Qing Dynasty",and focuses on"decadent aesthetics"by taking the theory of self-discipline produced by"Chinese modernity"as the standpoint and following the"dialogue-argumentation"fashion.It can be said that it is rare to find a title integrating such a wide field of vision,a high degree of speculation,clear expression and distinct personality in its target field.It is enough to become a model for post-scholars,in terms of"thought,inheritance,innovation,standardization,logic and style",and also a mirror for academic peers to strictly"self-discipline".

关 键 词：学术批评 颓废审美 中国现代性 学术价值 学术思想 学术创新 学术积累 学术出版 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]