从文化偏见到认知多元——对中国在非洲发展实践研究的文献回顾与批判  

From Cultural Prejudice to Cognitive Diversity:A Review of the Literature on China’s Development Practices in Africa

作　　者：孟雷[1] 孔德继 齐顾波[1] Meng Lei;Kong Deji;Qi Gubo(College of Humanities and Development Studies,China Agricultural University,Beijing)

机构地区：[1]中国农业大学人文与发展学院

出　　处：《经济社会体制比较》2020年第3期182-191,共10页Comparative Economic & Social Systems

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目“西方发展援助与中国发展援助的战略政策对比分析”(项目编号:16AZD017)。

摘　　要：在国际援助实践中,与经济合作与发展组织(OECD)成员国相比,中国对非洲援助有两个突出特点:一是援助常与投资相伴"走出去",二是给予受援国更多经济实惠且不附带政治诉求。近年来,中国对非洲援助和在非洲的投资规模增长迅速。文章认为,国际学界和各国政界对中国在非洲的投资与合作实践始终不乏争论,代表性观点包括"掠夺资源论""破坏环境论""加重债务危机论"等,还有与之相对的"北京共识""中国模式"等学说体系。不过,得益于研究方法的多样化,尤其是越来越多的学者对经验研究方法的采用,更多利益相关方的声音被纳入学术讨论,各种二元对立的预设被打破,中国在非洲的发展实践也因此得到了更为多元和公允的评价。Compared with OECD member states, China’s aid to African countries has two salient features. First, aid and investment are often accompanied by the going global strategy, and second, more economic benefits are given with no political string attached. In recent years, Chinese aid and investment scale have grown drastically in Africa. However, international academic and political communities in various countries have always been skeptical of Chinese investment and cooperation practices in Africa. Representative views included "neo-colonialism", "plundering resources", "environmental destruction" and "aggravation of debt crisis", as well as the corresponding responses of the "Beijing Consensus", the "China Model" and other academic systems. Thanks to the diversity of research methods, especially the adoption of empirical research methods by increasing scholars, the voices of more stakeholders have been concerned in academic discussions and various assumptions of binary opposition have been broken, while Chinese developmental practices in Africa have therefore received a more diverse and fair evaluation.

关 键 词：中非合作 “一带一路” 新殖民主义 国际发展 命运共同体 

分 类 号：C93-0[经济管理—管理学]