高影响力中华医学会系列期刊参考文献引用不合理情况与分析  

Unreasonable Citation of References in a Series of Journals of the Chinese Medical Association with High Influence

作　　者：孙宇航[1] 张孝利 李云霞[3] 朱红梅[1] SUN Yu-hang;ZHANG Xiao-li;LI Yun-xia;ZHU Hong-mei(Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Hepatology,No.2 Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 400010,China;Bishan District Hospital of TCM,Chongqing 402760,China;Medical Record Department,No.2 Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 400010,China)

机构地区：[1]重庆医科大学附属第二医院中华肝脏病杂志编辑部,重庆400010 [2]重庆市璧山区中医院,重庆402760 [3]重庆医科大学附属第二医院病案科,重庆400010

出　　处：《价值工程》2020年第17期229-232,共4页Value Engineering

基　　金：2015年重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学研究一般项目(项目编号:15SKG031);重庆市高校期刊研究会科研项目(项目编号:K201314)。

摘　　要：对5种影响力高且稳定的中华医学会系列期刊各选2014年的1期,对其中共46篇长篇论著参考文献中的期刊文献进行查阅分析。对762条中、英文期刊文献,共查阅全文714条,引用不合理(包括无关引用、多引、漏引、错引)的文献108条,占15.13%;中文文献引用不合理率较英文文献低(6.80%与17.28%)(x2=9.989,P<0.05,差异有统计学意义)。文献引用共有881处,引用不合理的有117处,占13.28%;中文文献引用不合理率低于英文文献(5.49%与15.31%)(x2=12.074,P<0.05,差异有统计学意义)。在不合理引用中,中、英文文献均以多引最为常见,其次分别为错引、漏引和无关引用。在错引中以数据错引较多,其次为观点错引和笔误。最后根据文献及本研究结果,提出相应建议。Five influential and stable periodicals of the Chinese Medical Association(CMA)series were selected in the first issue of 2014,among which 46 references were consulted and analyzed.Among 762 Chinese and English periodical documents,714 were consulted,108 were unreasonable(including unrelated citation,multiple citation,omission and misquotation),accounting for 15.13%.The unreasonable rate of Chinese literature citation was lower than that of English literature(6.80%and 17.28%)(x2=9.989,P<0.05,with significant difference).There were 881 references,117 of which were unreasonable,accounting for 13.28%;the unreasonable rate of Chinese references was lower than that of English ones(5.49%and 15.31%)(x2=12.074,P<0.05,with statistical significance).Among the unreasonable citations,multiple citations are the most common,followed by misquotations,omissions and irrelevant citations.Data misquotation is the most common misquotation,followed by opinion misquotation and pen misquotation.Finally,according to the literature and the results of this study,some suggestions are put forward.

关 键 词：医学期刊 学术影响力 引文 引用 

分 类 号：G353.1[文化科学—情报学] G237.5