被胁迫行为的刑法适用路径  

Application of Criminal Law to Coerced Behavior

作　　者：蔡可睿 CAI Kerui(School of Lazu,East China University of Political Science and Law,Wenzhou 325000,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,浙江温州325000

出　　处：《商丘职业技术学院学报》2020年第2期12-17,共6页JOURNAL OF SHANGQIU POLYTECHNIC

摘　　要：司法实践对被胁迫行为的认定仅仅局限于胁从犯理论,这是对被胁迫行为的内涵在理解范围上的缩小和局限。我国刑法中的被胁迫行为既包括阻却犯罪的被胁迫行为,也包括影响量刑的被胁迫行为。被胁迫行为应当包含三种类型:第一种是受到绝对强制无法做出自由选择的被胁迫行为,应当适用我国《刑法》关于"不可抗力"的规定;第二种是受到相对强制能够做出选择但不负刑事责任的被胁迫行为,应当适用我国《刑法》关于"紧急避险"的规定;第三种是成立故意犯罪和避险过当的被胁迫行为,应当适用我国《刑法》关于"胁从犯"的规定。Judicial practice's determination of coerced behavior is limited to the theory of coercion,which is a reduction in the scope of understanding of the content of coerced behavior.The coerced behaviors in China's criminal law include both coerced behaviors that prevent crimes and coerced behaviors that affect sentencing.There are three types of acts of coercion:First,those who are absolutely forced to make a free choice should be subject to the"force majeure"provisions of China's criminal law;Second,they can make a choice but are not criminally liable under relative coercion responsibility for intimidation should apply the provisions of our criminal law on"emergency avoidance";Third,the establishment of intentional crimes and excessive risk aversion should be subject to our criminal law's"complicity.

关 键 词：被胁迫行为 不可抗力 紧急避险 胁从犯 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]