委托人介入权的制度困局与破解  

Institutional Dilemma and the Dimension of Cracking of the Client’s Right of Intervention

作　　者：刘浩然 Liu Haoran

机构地区：[1]江汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430056

出　　处：《行政与法》2020年第6期120-128,F0003,共10页Administration and Law

摘　　要：委托人介入权制度能有效弥补大陆法系代理制度中的显名原则在应对复杂交易实践时的不足。但我国现行法律在制度构造上囿于显名原则而过于保守,一定程度上影响了该制度在保护本人利益、简化纠纷解决程序上的积极作用。因此,应合理借鉴域外法经验,适当扩宽委托人介入权的行使要件,明确委托人行使介入权将在代理权范围内发生法律效果直接归属的效力,从合同条款和个人因素两个方面确立委托人介入权的阻却事由,以此破解委托人介入权制度在司法适用中的困局。The principal’s intervention right on Indirect agency can effectively make up the lake of explicit principal when dealing with the complex trading practice.However,China’s current legislation is too conservative in terms of the structure of the system,which seriously affects the positive role of the system in protecting principal’s interests and simplifying dispute resolution procedures.Therefore,we should make full use of the experience of extraterritorial law and explain the system from the aspects of the conditions of application,the legal force and the elimination to solve the dilemma of judicial application of the system of The principal’s intervention right on Indirect agency.In detail,it is necessary to expand the application of the principal’s intervention right,to clear that the principal’s right to intervene will be directly attributable to the legal effect within the scope of agent’s actual authority and to establish the elimination of the right from contract terms and personal factors.

关 键 词：委托人介入权 间接代理 显名原则 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]