检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何涛[1] He Tao
机构地区:[1]四川大学,四川成都610207
出 处:《贵州省党校学报》2020年第3期77-88,共12页Journal of Guizhou Provincial Party School
摘 要:人工智能技术的当代发展创造了一个又一个若干年前人类意料之外的奇迹,随着其技术的不断进步与实际运用的深入推广,对传统法律人格秩序形成了潜在冲击。人工智能本身的智能程度和社会需求决定了将来确认人工智能法律人格的可能性甚至必要性。人工智能已然具备相应的意志能力和学习能力,具有客观的算法人格,现阶段仍不能确认其法律人格,主要是因为人工智能缺乏社会性。然而,基于人工智能技术高速发展的趋势,突破社会性边界很难肯定说没有可能。所以,对人工智能法律人格的确认应该成为法学界高度关注的现实问题。The contemporary development of artificial intelligence technology has created one miracle after another that was unexpected to mankind several years ago.With the continuous progress of its technology and the in-depth promotion of its practical application,it has formed a potential impact on the traditional legal personality order.The degree of artificial intelligence and social needs determine the possibility and even necessity of recognizing artificial legal personality in the future.Artificial intelligence already has the corresponding willpower and learning ability.It has objective algorithmic personality,but its legal personality can not be confirmed at this stage,mainly due to the lack of sociality of artificial intelligence.However,based on the rapid development trend of artificial intelligence technology,it is difficult to say that it is impossible to break through the social boundary.Therefore,the recognition of legal personality of artificial intelligence should become a real problem of great concern in the legal field.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222