1890年《中英会议藏印条约》谈判中的中锡边界交涉  

The Sino-Sikkimese Border Negotiation in the Negotiation of“Sino-British Convention of 1890”

作　　者：吕昭义[1] 陶亮 Lyu Zhaoyi;Tao Liang

机构地区：[1]云南大学 [2]云南大学历史与档案学院,昆明650091

出　　处：《中国边疆史地研究》2020年第2期112-128,215,共18页China's Borderland History and Geography Studies

基　　金：2018年国家社科基金项目“清代中印关系汉文史料研究”(18BSS007);2018年国家社科基金“防范化解重大风险”重大研究专项项目“提高中印边界战略管控能力研究”(18VFH012)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在英国发动第一次侵藏战争前,中锡间以分水岭以外的日纳为界,并不存在边界争议。中锡边界争端的根源在于英国和英属印度武装打开西藏通商门户的战略意图与行动,引发边界争端的隆吐归属争议不过是英国和英属印度发动侵藏战争的托词。《中英会议藏印条约》是强权政治的结果。该条约“以分水岭划界”,将日纳宗划入英国保护下的锡金,是英国和英属印度提出并压迫中方接受,中国作出了重大妥协而达成的。该条约是一个不平等条约,但该条约中的“分水岭划界”是双方认同的。Before the first war of British invasion to China s Tibet,the border line between China and Sikkim was in Rina(日纳)beyond the watershed,and there was no border disputes between the two countries.The source of the border disputes was from Britain and British India s strategic intention and action to open the trade channel to Tibet,the controversy about the ownership of Longtu(隆吐)was used as a pretext for starting the war of invasion to China s Tibet.The Sino-British Convention of 1890 was the result of power politics.This Convention stipulated that boundaries should follow the watershed,and brought Rina to Sikkim that was under the protection of Britain.which was put forward and forced China to accept by Britain.Although the Convention was an unequal one,the“watershed line”in it was agreed by two sides.

关 键 词：中印关系 《中英会议藏印条约》 中锡边界 

分 类 号：D99[政治法律—国际法学]