从“通知移除规则”到“通知屏蔽规则”——《数字千年版权法》“避风港制度”现代化路径分析  

From"Notice-and-Takedown"to"Notice-and-Staydown"--Analysis of The Modernization Path of The"Safe Harbor Rules"in The Digital Millennium Copyright Act

作　　者：朱开鑫 Zhu Kaixin

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院法学研究所

出　　处：《电子知识产权》2020年第5期42-52,共11页Electronics Intellectual Property

摘　　要：为了应对信息传播速率提升带来的版权反复侵权和大规模侵权问题,规制内容生成模式变迁引发的平台利用用户侵权内容牟利的商业实践,美国国会启动了"避风港制度"的现代化改革进程。版权过滤技术的发展使得平台预防和治理在线侵权的能力获得极大提升,立基于版权"侵权替代责任理论"的"通知屏蔽规则"在此背景下应运而生。"通知屏蔽规则"与欧盟"版权授权与过滤义务"的新近改革具有高度的内在一致,代表了平台注意义务的未来发展方向,对于当下我国网络服务提供者侵权责任制度的完善具有重要的借鉴意义。Congress of the United States launched the modernization reform process of safe harbor rules,so as to deal with the problems of repeated copyright infringement and large-scale infringement caused by the increase of information dissemination rate,and to regulate the business practice of making profits from user infringing content caused by the change of content generation mode.With the development of copyright filtration technology,the platform's ability to prevent and control online infringement has been greatly improved.Under this background,the"Notice-and-Staydown"based on the copyright"theory of tort vicarious liability"came into being.The"Notice-and-Staydown"is highly consistent with the recent reform of the"Copyright Authorization and Filtration Obligation"of the European Union,which represents the future development direction of the platform's duty of care,and thus has an important implication for the revision of the"Internet special article"of the tort liability of the civil code of China at present.

关 键 词：平台责任现代化 “避风港制度” “通知屏蔽规则” 版权过滤技术 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]