中国自然遗产地的森林损失和人为压力分析  

The Analysis of the Forest Loss and Human Pressure in Natural Heritage Sites of China

作　　者：张少宇 朱岚巍 邹时林[1] Zhang Shaoyu;Zhu Lanwei;Zou Shilin(Institute of Surveying and Mapping,East China University of Technology,Nanchang 330013,China;Aerospace Information Research Institute,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100094,China)

机构地区：[1]东华理工大学测绘工程学院,江西南昌330013 [2]中国科学院空天信息创新研究院,北京100094

出　　处：《湖南生态科学学报》2020年第2期7-17,共11页Journal of Hunan Ecological Science

基　　金：海南省自然科学基金面上项目(417217);中国科学院战略性A类先导科技专项(XDA19030500)。

摘　　要：研究尝试从森林损失和人为压力两个大的方面,对中国17个自然遗产地进行对比分析.结果表明:(1)中国自然遗产地遗产区的森林损失率最高不超过2%,缓冲区的森林损失率最高达16%;(2)中国80%的自然遗产地在1993年~2016年期间人类活动强度有所增加,泰山、武陵源风景区人为压力增加较多,且泰山人为压力状态一直处于高等级;(3)森林损失与人为压力存在弱相关,相关性为正;受综合影响较大的自然遗产地有武夷山、中国丹霞、泰山,同时应根据综合因子指数等级大小加大其自然遗产地的保护力度;(4)此外,自然遗产地缓冲区受到的综合影响普遍高于遗产区,未来也应该重视缓冲区的保护工作.A comparative study of 17 natural heritage sites of China was conducted from two aspects:forest loss and human pressure.The results showed that:(1)The forest loss rate in natural heritage sites of China is no more than 2%,and the forest loss rate in the buffer zone is up to 16%.(2)The intensity of human activities in 80%natural heritage sites of China had increased from 1993 to 2016.The pressure laid by the human in Taishan and Wulingyuan Scenic Areas increased a lot,and that in Taishan was always at a high level.(3)There is a weak correlation between forest loss and human practice,which tends to be positive in its correlation;areas such as Wuyishan,China Danxia,and Taishan,are affected to a large extent;the protection of natural heritage sites could be enhanced by the comprehensive index.Furthermore,the impact of the buffer zone of natural heritage sites is generally higher than that of the heritage zone,and its protection should be emphasized in the future as well.

关 键 词：自然遗产地 森林损失 人为压力 缓冲区 

分 类 号：TU986[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]