检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄永吉[1] 牛同红 庞丽[1] 于泓[1] Huang Yongji;Niu Tonghong;Pang Li;Yu Hong(Municipal Hospital of Weihai City,Shandong Province,Shandong Weihai 264200)
出 处:《中国社区医师》2020年第17期39-39,41,共2页Chinese Community Doctors
基 金:威海市科技发展计划项目,立项编号2015GNS0044-4。
摘 要:目的:探究改良急救模式对急救创伤患者抢救成功率和并发症的影响。方法:2017年11月-2018年11月收治急救创伤患者94例,随机分为两组,各47例。试验组实施改良急救模式;对照组实施常规急救模式。比较两组患者抢救后的基本情况。结果:试验组抢救成功率高于对照组,病死率和并发症发生率均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组重症监护时间、急诊停留时间及住院时间均少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对急救创伤患者实施改良急救模式,不仅能够提高抢救成功率,还能够有效降低并发症发生率。Objective:To explore the effect of modified first aid mode on the rescue success rate and complications of emergency trauma patients.Methods:From November 2017 to November 2018,94 emergency trauma patients were enrolled,they were randomly divided into two groups with 47 cases in each group.The experimental group implemented the modified first aid mode.The control group implemented the conventional first aid mode.The basic conditions after rescue of the two groups was compared.Results:The success rate of rescue in the experimental group was higher than in the control group,and the mortality and incidence of complication were lower than in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The duration of intensive care,emergency stay and length of hospital stay in the experimental group were less than in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Implementing an modified first aid mode for first aid trauma patients can not only improve the success rate of rescue,but also effectively reduce the incidence of complications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145