检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:边福秋 BIAN Fu-qiu(Ward of Zhangji Town Health Center,Shanxian,Shandong Province,274000 China)
机构地区:[1]山东单县张集镇卫生院病房,山东菏泽274000
出 处:《糖尿病新世界》2020年第9期13-14,47,共3页Diabetes New World Magazine
摘 要:目的研究循证护理干预途径在糖尿病护理中的应用。方法选择该院2018年9月-2019年10月间收治的糖尿病患者110例作为分析对象,采用双盲法将其分为常规组和试验组,常规组55例、试验组55例。其中常规组患者行常规护理,试验组患者行循证护理干预。对比两组患者血糖水平、临床疗效、护理满意度。结果常规组的血糖水平相较于试验组明显更高,常规组总有效率相较于试验组明显更低,常规组护理满意度相较于试验组明显更低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对糖尿病患者实施循证护理干预,能够有效降低患者血糖水平,在临床护理中值得广泛应用。Objective To study the application of evidence-based nursing interventions in diabetes care.Methods 110 cases of diabetic patients treated in the hospital from September 2018 to October 2019 were selected as the analysis objects,and they were divided into a conventional group and a test group,55 patients in the conventional group and 55 patients in the experimental group by double-blind method.Patients in the routine group received routine nursing care,and patients in the experimental group received evidence-based nursing intervention.The blood glucose levels,clinical efficacy,and nursing satisfaction of the two groups were compared.Results The blood glucose level of the conventional group was significantly higher than that of the experimental group,the total effective rate of the conventional group was significantly lower than that of the experimental group,and the nursing satisfaction of the conventional group was significantly lower than that of the experimental group,with significant differences(P<0.05),has statistical significance.Conclusion Evidence-based nursing intervention for diabetic patients can effectively reduce blood glucose levels of patients,and it is worthy of widespread application in clinical nursing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145