检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林子江[1] 谢林杉 赵永忠[1] 苏文静 胡淑锦 陈林[2] 杨闯[1] LIN Zijiang;XIE Linshan;ZHAO Yongzhong;SU Wenjing;HU Shujin;CHEN Lin;YANG Chuang(Department of Psychiatry,the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University,Wenzhou 325000,China;Department of Psychiatry,Wenzhou Medical University,Wenzhou 325000,China)
机构地区:[1]温州医科大学附属第一医院精神卫生科,浙江温州325000 [2]温州医科大学精神医学系,浙江温州325000
出 处:《健康研究》2020年第3期285-287,296,共4页Health Research
基 金:温州市科技计划项目(Y20190097)。
摘 要:目的探讨大学新生应对方式在情绪调节自我效能感和社交焦虑关系中的中介作用。方法选取温州市某医科大学新生588人,采用情绪调节自我效能感量表、应对方式问卷及Liebowitz社交焦虑量表分别测量大学生的情绪调节自我效能感、应对方式和社交焦虑水平。结果情绪调节自我效能感得分与消极应对(r1)、社交焦虑得分(r2)呈负相关(r1=-0. 26,r2=-0. 42,均P<0. 01),与积极应对(r3)呈正相关(r3=0. 36,P<0. 01);社交焦虑的得分与消极应对方式(r4)、合理化(r5)均呈正相关(r4=0. 40,r5=0. 21,均P<0. 01),与积极应对方式(r6)呈负相关(r6=-0. 34,P<0. 01);情绪调节自我效能感与合理化无相关性。Bootstrap中介效应检验表明,情绪调节自我效能感的直接效应为-0. 73,占总效应的67%;消极应对在情绪调节自我效能感和社交焦虑之间的中介效应值为-0. 19,占总体效应的17%;积极应对在情绪调节自我效能感和社交焦虑之间的效应值为-0. 17,占总体效应的16%。结论大学新生的情绪调节自我效能感可预测社交焦虑,应对方式在情绪调节自我效能感和社交焦虑之间具有部分中介作用。Objective To explore the mediating role of coping style in the relationship between freshmen’s self-efficacy of emotion regulation and social anxiety.Methods A total of 588 freshmen from a Medical University in Wenzhou were selected to measure the self-efficacy,coping style and social anxiety of college students with emotion regulation self-efficacy scale,coping style questionnaire and Liebowitz social anxiety scale.Results The scores of self-efficacy of emotion regulation were negatively correlated with the scores of negative coping(r 1),social anxiety(r 2)(r 1=-0.26,r 2=-0.42;P<0.01),and positively correlated with the scores of positive coping(r 3)(r 3=0.36,P<0.01).The scores of social anxiety were positively correlated with negative coping style(r 4),rationalization(r 5)(r 4=0.40,r 5=0.21;均P<0.01),and negatively correlated with positive coping style(r 6)(r 6=-0.34,P<0.01).There was no correlation between self-efficacy of emotion regulation and rationalization.Bootstrap test showed that the direct effect of self-efficacy of emotion regulation was-0.73,accounting for 67%of the total effect;the intermediate effect of negative coping between self-efficacy of emotion regulation and social anxiety was-0.19,accounting for 17%of the total effect;the effect of positive coping between self-efficacy of emotion regulation and social anxiety was-0.17,accounting for 16%of the total effect.Conclusions College freshmen’s self-efficacy of emotion regulation could predict social anxiety,and coping styles played a part of mediating role between self-efficacy of emotion regulation and social anxiety.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185