检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李宗凯 LI Zongkai(Beijing General Municipal Engineering Design and Research Institute Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100082,China)
机构地区:[1]北京市市政工程设计研究总院有限公司,北京100082
出 处:《建筑结构》2020年第11期46-51,共6页Building Structure
摘 要:针对以建筑为主体的建-桥合建高架车站,提出相应的结构性能化设计标准,并通过算例验证了该类高架车站的具体结构性能化设计方法,即车站整体按照建抗规计算,相关构件按照铁抗规及桥抗规复核;这一设计方法综合了建抗规、铁抗规和桥抗规的相关要求,并最大程度满足了上述规范的规定。此外,通过对比计算,比较按照新老规范设计的横向双柱建-桥合建高架车站之间的安全储备差异,得到按照建抗规进行结构性能化设计的车站结果偏于安全的结论。Aiming at the integrated building-bridge elevated station for the building as the main body,the corresponding structural performance-based seismic design standards were proposed,and the specific structural performance-based seismic design method of this type of elevated station was verified through an example.That is,the entire station was calculated according to seismic design codes,and the relevant components were reviewed in accordance with railway seismic design codes and bridge seismic design codes;this design method gave consideration to relevant requirements of seismic design codes,railway seismic design codes and bridge seismic design codes,and met requirements of the above codes to the greatest extent.In addition,through comparison calculations,the safety reserve differences between the horizontal doublecolumn integrated building-bridge elevated station designed in accordance with the new and old codes were compared,to conclude that the structural performance-based seismic design of the station in accordance with the seismic design code is safer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.239