检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王恒建[1] 朱丽丹[1] 张俊松[1] 汪宏[1] WANG Heng-jian;ZHU Li-dan;ZHANG Jun-song(The First People's Hospita1 of Hefei,Hefei 230001,Anhui)
机构地区:[1]合肥市第一人民医院普外科,安徽合肥230001
出 处:《安徽卫生职业技术学院学报》2020年第3期38-40,共3页Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical College
摘 要:目的:探讨腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)与开放手术治疗胆总管结石的疗效。方法:将70例因胆总管结石行手术治疗的患者根据手术时期不同分为腔镜组(32例)和开放组(38例)。比较两组患者手术时间、手术中出血量及手术后排气时间、住院时间、并发症。结果:两组患者手术时间、手术后并发症方面差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在出血量、排气时间、手术后住院时间方面腔镜组明显优于开放组(P<0.05)。与开放组比较,腔镜组出血量少(P<0.001),腔镜组术后排气早(P<0.001),腔镜组术后住院天数短(P<0.001)。结论:LCBDE治疗胆总管结石安全有效,手术创伤轻,手术后恢复快,值得临床推行。Objective:Effect and application value of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and open operation in treatment of common bile duct stones were compared.Methods:Seventy patients with common bile duct stones and Gallbladder stones were treated with operation.All the cases were divided into two groups according to the different operation period:laparoscopic common bile duct exploration group and open operation group.The operating time,bleeding volume,postoperative ventilation time,postoperative complications and postoperative hospital stay were compared.Results:There were no statistical differences between the two groups in the operation time and postoperative complications(P>0.05).Compared to the open operation,LCBDE group had shorter postoperative ventilation time,less bleeding volume,and shorter postoperative hospital stay.The differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions:LCBDE in treating common bile duct stone is safe and effective with small trauma and quicker recovery.It is worth clinical promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31