腹腔镜和传统开放输尿管切开取石效果对比  

Laparoscopic and traditional open cut ureteral lithotomy contrast effect

作　　者：李凯[1] LI Kai(Guizhou Aerospace Hospital Uropoiesis Surgical Department,Zunyi 563000,Guizhou)

机构地区：[1]贵州航天医院泌尿外科,贵州遵义563000

出　　处：《安徽卫生职业技术学院学报》2020年第3期64-65,共2页Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical College

摘　　要：目的:对输尿管结石患者采用腹腔镜和传统开放切开术干预,分析对比临床改善效果。方法:选取医院收治的60例输尿管结石患者,随机将其分两组,治疗组患者采用腹腔镜法,对照组患者进行开放术。对两组患者治疗效果指标(额外镇痛药使用率、镇痛泵使用时间及术后住院时间)给予记录观察。结果:与对照组比,治疗组患者镇痛泵使用时间及术后住院时间均明显缩短;额外镇痛药使用率明显降低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:治疗输尿管结石采用腹腔镜术其效果明显,临床疗效确切,同时缩短住院时间,术后恢复速度较快,在临床治疗中值得借鉴。Objective:Patients with ureteral calculi by laparoscopic and traditional open dissection intervention,analyzed clinical improvement.Methods:to select hospital treatment of 60 cases of ureteral calculi patients it is divided into two groups at random,the treatment group using the laparoscopic method,the control group to open surgery patients.Therapeutic effect in patients with two groups of indicators(additional analgesics usage,analgesia pump use time and postoperative hospital stay)for record.Results:compared with control group,treatment group patients with analgesia pump use time and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shortened;Significantly lower additional analgesics usage,significant differences between groups(P<0.05).Conclusion:In the treatment of ureteral calculi with laparoscopic its obvious effects,clinical curative effect and shorten the length of hospital stay,postoperative recovery degree faster,in clinical treatment is worth using for reference.

关 键 词：腹腔镜 输尿管 对比 临床疗效 

分 类 号：R699[医药卫生—泌尿科学]