检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何鲲 张玉娟[1] 叶猛猛 赵鹏伟 徐金哲 HE Kun;ZHANG Yujuan;YE Mengmeng;ZHAO Pengwei;XU Jinzhe(College of Surveying and Mapping Engineering,Heilongjiang Institute of Technology,Harbin 150050,China;Zhejiang Huakun Geological Development Co.,Ltd.,Wenzhou 325006,China)
机构地区:[1]黑龙江工程学院测绘工程学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150050 [2]浙江华坤地质发展有限公司,浙江温州325006
出 处:《测绘与空间地理信息》2020年第6期81-84,共4页Geomatics & Spatial Information Technology
基 金:黑龙江工程学院博士科研启动基金(2017BJ03);国家自然科学基金(41701198);黑龙江省2019年大学生创新训练计划项目(201911802035)资助。
摘 要:以松花江流域(哈尔滨段)为研究区域,对研究区域进行2005、2010和2015年3期景观类型提取,统计研究区域各期景观类型面积,通过景观格局脆弱性指数模型计算研究区域3期整体景观格局脆弱性,分析研究区域各种景观类型及景观脆弱性随时间的变化特征。结果表明:1) 2005-2015年,研究区域耕地、未利用地面积呈现逐渐减少态势,建设用地、林地、草地面积呈现逐渐增多态势,水域景观呈现先增加后减少的变化。2) 2005-2010年,耕地景观面积转出最多,转出2.96%,建设用地景观面积转入最多,转入1.57%;2010-2015年,仍然是耕地景观面积转出最多,转出1.20%,林地景观面积转入最多,转入0.99%。3) 2005-2015年,研究区域3期整体景观格局脆弱性分别为2.087 4、2.205 0和2.104 5,呈现先增加后减小的变化。In this paper,the vulnerability index of landscape pattern is constructed by the sensitivity,adaptability of landscape pattern,and population pressure index.Taking the Songhua River Basin(Harbin Section)as the research area,we extract three sta-ges of landscape type in 2005,2010,and 2015.On the basis of statistics,the area of landscape types in each period was calculated,and the vulnerabilities of landscape patterns in three periods were calculated through the construction formula of landscape pattern vul-nerability index.The change characteristics of landscape types and landscape vulnerability over time were analyzed.The results show that:(1)From 2005 to 2015,the area of cultivated land and unused land decreased gradually,the area of construction land,forest land and grassland increased gradually,and the water landscape increased first and then decreased.(2)From 2005 to 2010,the lar-gest amount of arable landscape area was decreased by 2.96%,and the largest amount of construction landscape area was increased by 1.57%.From 2010 to 2015,arable landscape area was still the most transferred and decreased by 1.20%,forest landscape area was increased the most by 0.99%.(3)From 2005 to 2015,the vulnerabilities of the overall landscape patterns in three periods were 2.0874,2.2050,and 2.1045 in the study area,which increased first and then decreased.
关 键 词:松花江流域(哈尔滨段) 景观格局 景观格局脆弱性 变化分析
分 类 号:P237[天文地球—摄影测量与遥感]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117